Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 10 August 2008 23:07 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E1E28C1EF; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0BD28C1E6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PodZI22xFld4 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.225]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCF128C1EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1633712rvf.49 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:07:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lw0w0OZmGheFPICVLp3TDgsRtscFGtfF4sxB4drl6SI=; b=n1FnRwTuziO5sjMn9K1pb2psfiezGyEaBKeel+yQc4WthcUYJUxWqCoLVDivkUKhmj LO+rsnWqr0Z4r22l8rinAvzll6QMIiYIW1rYGNMh+fx5OIquC3BxNVKzhU8zk48t2srk lortgSyL2RpNIh/mM1r9RPZcqng9u574vDeg0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=bm54YinWduZQT/ZWMGzoYSNMQxbUDJVwqWDBbtPmPcupEeojPxCHgbPAAYevgoUR73 c0FY1G03YUoLCJ1O+u/lSG8umWNLEXVvbky87T0agQg3SkRld2sCZ3Cz3DLUiKTZJDFf eS+/FDlxoWuVtmV8va3JbDhaz+Hs5A9JM3Eyk=
Received: by 10.140.247.11 with SMTP id u11mr3052458rvh.37.1218409637926; Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? ( [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l31sm7395547rvb.6.2008.08.10.16.07.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <489F7496.1090608@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:07:02 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist
References: <97789FA162BD4EEA9E668BD21E372BAD@BertLaptop> <489DC3E0.3000202@dcrocker.net> <46FE4022D7A994D15EA0F360@p3.JCK.COM> <0CDF1105EE0F431B9B8D0D6B8D9AFC7A@BertLaptop> <EFB863C6392FD44E6F24541C@p3.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <EFB863C6392FD44E6F24541C@p3.JCK.COM>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
On 2008-08-10 07:58, John C Klensin wrote: > > --On Saturday, 09 August, 2008 20:52 +0200 "Bert Wijnen > \\(IETF\\)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> wrote: > >> John and Dave, >> >> I think that both of you (and some others) arwe looking at the >> ID_Checklist >> too much as if it is part of our (rigid) process. Our >> processes aredescribed >> in formally approved BCP documents. >> >> The ID-Checklist is intended (or at least that is how it >> started, and as far >> as I am concerned that is still the intention) to help in a >> few areas: > > Bert, > > We are in complete and utter agreement with each other about the > appropriate role of the ID_Checklist. For better or worse, the > IESG apparently does not agree, as evidenced most recently in > their response to my appeal about turning a suggestion from the > original version of the Checklist into a firm rule without > having that explicitly confirmed by the community. > > We also agree that revising the Checklist into a document that > is suitable for use as part of a package of firm rules is a > rather different job than updating it while being consistent > with its original purpose. > > So I withdraw my suggestion and comments but strongly suggest > that you make sure that your intentions for the document and > those of the IESG are in synch before proceeding much further. I'd like to say that both as an author and as a reviewer, I have always found both the ID checklist and the IDnits checker to be of immense pragmatic value. Obviously, if the checklist or the checker complains about something that isn't obviously a bug, the author, shepherd, AD or reviewer will have to enter "think" mode or even "negotiate" mode. I agree that it's a good idea to be clear about that. Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Frank Ellermann
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Pete Resnick
- Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist IETF Chair
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Dave Crocker
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Pete Resnick
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Dave Crocker
- RE: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bert Wijnen - IETF
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- RE: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bert Wijnen - IETF
- RE: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Theodore Tso
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Frank Ellermann
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Thomas Narten
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bill McQuillan
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Spencer Dawkins
- More example TLDs in 2606bis? (was: Call for revi… Frank Ellermann
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Keith Moore
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Ted Hardie
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Keith Moore
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Frank Ellermann
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bob Braden
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Eliot Lear
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Keith Moore
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Dave Crocker
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Frank Ellermann
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Dave Crocker
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Dave Crocker
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… John C Klensin
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Lars Eggert
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Henrik Levkowetz
- ID desires and TOOLS stuff [was: Re: Call for rev… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Julian Reschke
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Dave Crocker
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Dave Crocker
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… SM
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Mixed case (was: Call for review of proposed upda… Frank Ellermann
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Russ Housley
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Frank Ellermann
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Dave Crocker
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Dave Crocker
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Chec… Robert Elz