Re: [6tisch] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17.txt> (Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration) to Best Current Practice

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 30 January 2017 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3082012954A; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:56:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z9gGtmiXs6Of; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:56:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x241.google.com (mail-qk0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFA0912953F; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:56:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x241.google.com with SMTP id i34so17099068qkh.3; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:56:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=fJ2r/uKkOYO+uuKEFAQUyOXiE7gUj/a/ET5Oe9nDDuo=; b=N4ELX8PRqj+Konor7Ua1U0mT76ctQRrRUvJ9/jTA4jKZ7zkvp5pMqktRvJlPOUwJGO x0A2YQY7ZP6O+nr/vz/VFAn8OUlpE2vHqWK2Ai3CBn3GBVy9u97M6Gf/oOsTZKjr8S6/ yRArCdOeRA5KhyMSHV1GK85crJyYjjDn3aNbNmaXOszi2iccMXHMHa3GKgPihhXlyZF3 r0MOl97A/eF1rt71EN+sGdVAq6+xZ51HQw1ZbI1tSpSrXwYCZ/VaFvQ2t+s5bgp1Z1X0 4NuvCVJqx6zl0lJ6rdXgX8anKAhCJh02XQ4nTz7HT2+u32l4tDg4cELpwgPCIl+1PqPP f/MA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=fJ2r/uKkOYO+uuKEFAQUyOXiE7gUj/a/ET5Oe9nDDuo=; b=XBP2uC/QJ/GQHtLM2cxtRXV3ETiQIKKpMdNdYd5pPFp/m0hwxaEZeWf5XCtkyYcKa1 ndHZaZBwMtFx8g8Vny19uVwui6/qrdSkMBhJv7uwMkEundJ7jTxmGLxbem+B7d1fdJc6 3JraUmJZhQIvmEm9wSwNDwdSJnO4lBRWqwyZ4HVooPx0ku5QzT8jKobKYQ04C2oDPrkJ Nmwnp+Vrikf2LTeGNnBAAWUcFNUjE/EHlHTqQsm7c5CT89y1PCoDAli94wmMZEAlkhfr FqtzJ2gVEkP1ybKewiBUTdmC4E/KO2a35kjLH6b4eBD0//TUGmRNN9eZWQ0r9s2sLXrw iUkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIceJRjupr+L1jVdijlM2Qud/k6dtmHNlAVOr/fJPj16nab38XrlRHqlXwL9D7ASg==
X-Received: by 10.55.162.138 with SMTP id l132mr21720521qke.204.1485795389017; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:56:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18f:801:600:1b8:4618:13aa:9204? ([2601:18f:801:600:1b8:4618:13aa:9204]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e3sm12625186qtg.7.2017.01.30.08.56.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:56:28 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Last Call: <draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17.txt> (Minimal 6TiSCH Configuration) to Best Current Practice
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <43CFAE07-24CA-48D5-BEE9-4EC5379B2F60@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 11:56:25 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A789315B-03B7-456C-B05D-467DD734CD4E@gmail.com>
References: <148103459764.1842.9947168180087183897.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D922CE22-B407-4B70-A9CB-D46DF81A338D@gmail.com> <CAMsDxWQ1r5nVbjZBYnbSDZjuf4XFf0=63oLvFWcU=U-7Q1HpOw@mail.gmail.com> <43CFAE07-24CA-48D5-BEE9-4EC5379B2F60@gmail.com>
To: 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/x7A7saJCagyZty8xnX-RPOZ3K1c>
Cc: draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal@ietf.org, 6tisch-chairs@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 16:56:31 -0000

I've reviewed draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-19.  Thank you to the authors and the WG for considering the input from my earlier reviews and careful revision of the document to address that input.

In general, I think the document is now almost ready for publication.  The major points from my review of -17 have been addressed.

I do have a few minor points for the authors and WG to consider:

Does the WG have consensus that IPv6 address selection, prefix advertisement, and the details of ND need not be addressed in this document?

I don't see a default value for EB_PERIOD defined anywhere.  Is such a definition needed?

Section 5.2 requires implementation of RPL non-storing mode and recommends implementation of storing mode.  How does a node know whether RPL is being used in non-storing or storing mode?

- Ralph