Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 13 March 2020 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051B93A077D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 06:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iip4TPyoyRYf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 06:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3368C3A077A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 06:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.113] (p548DCD70.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.205.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48f6g43kw0z10H7; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:56:16 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <EC8024D5-B1D7-4DCD-862D-88167A7C00BF@eggert.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:56:16 +0100
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 605800576.025228-bb799be46ad3af33538a01e69db9cc33
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <06D1FC0A-5A8C-4C34-93AF-A8AC474E8B43@tzi.org>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <EC8024D5-B1D7-4DCD-862D-88167A7C00BF@eggert.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/x7JUOqDbqEgc4RxE9Wg8GceDLE0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:56:21 -0000

On 2020-03-13, at 14:50, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:
> 
> I don't understand how that is not the obvious answer.

But IETF107 is not completely canceled.

Instead of counting everyone as registered, we could require registration for IETF107 like for the previous ones, and just ignore whether that was physical (which is not possible) or online.

Grüße, Carsten