Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 03 August 2012 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84EA21E804E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.121, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g63d7mq6RKk4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A480721F8E05 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sm-THINK.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q73Kcmv3010640; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1344026335; bh=EWU4TrWGBFWqbGtXq/FA7D/ZTBA1cu5dQbxTF8/KK58=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=0sE1SngQqRgZ0ty9U81mfzXMjXwJjlbHEJxzyAKmSml7DkIb/pdpgGp+DLGaaMwX3 AkCXYHXVyhSQ7rkxQfssxy81DnAmiux1WkwMLLDIvgYjtzGt8GPomp53viVzeZoq8P ZwX0KtKEaeI+azOSKH9vHv4pSAz8mDS/XEYaRauA=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1344026335; i=@resistor.net; bh=EWU4TrWGBFWqbGtXq/FA7D/ZTBA1cu5dQbxTF8/KK58=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=JeNZVFt1N/37qXfLSi6BRInR3lVImXtE3ZEW/ysg4pdIUuxbFuF6DUclvaeYHivIY YymVqjZjbuHY09lonsVE53rLRhjgkbKnxM7Va82A0VK7Lu9f7a4w//o24vZETHb/cw u5tB5oR9SpM0Cb355+INApIYdqNYYCPOn1JHxU/E=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120803091255.09587b30@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:27:01 -0700
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting
In-Reply-To: <501B7B43.70202@gmail.com>
References: <20120802184436.87A0318C11F@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <B6033EB2-3B90-4524-A123-38852C5E2698@virtualized.org> <4401D68C-F9BB-4777-845A-A7011C50F1EA@cs.columbia.edu> <501B7B43.70202@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 20:39:11 -0000

At 12:18 AM 8/3/2012, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>Exactly. It is intended to defeat the Internet's historical growth model
>of independence from national administrations and monopolies, by imposing
>a geographical addressing scheme. Since the Internet actually works with
>a topological addressing scheme, the effect is to force the topology
>to be congruent with the geography. If you want central control, that's

Yes.  However that message is not reaching the 
people who are part of national administrations.

At 12:25 AM 8/3/2012, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>The key here is control.

SAAG [1] might consider working on that Worst 
Common Practice document to explain to countries 
how they should "cut off" the Internet ( 
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-irtfopen-1.pdf ). :-)

If I am not mistaken the control points are 
already in place in one or more countries.  The 
key may be control.  It may also be a desire to 
address a problem which people consider as important.

Regards,
-sm

1. There is generally one of more interesting 
presentations at SAAG.  I don't know how the Security ADs make that happen.