Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft
Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net> Sun, 12 September 2010 14:20 UTC
Return-Path: <henk@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B932B3A67FF for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 07:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.944
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.944 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.755, BAYES_20=-0.74, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uObrcREykl1C for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 07:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postlady.ripe.net (postlady.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:610:240:11::c100:1341]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182983A677D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 07:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dodo.ipv6.ripe.net ([2001:610:240:23::c100:1704] helo=dodo.ripe.net) by postlady.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <henk@ripe.net>) id 1OunQT-0002Nc-EZ for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:21:07 +0200
Received: from [193.0.21.124] (helo=geir.local) by dodo.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <henk@ripe.net>) id 1OunQS-0000OX-Qn for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:21:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4C8CE1CC.9040005@ripe.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:21:00 +0200
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net>
Organization: RIPE NCC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft
References: <3D5CA93C-1A93-4AEA-B679-C15E6FCBC26D@gmail.com> <F1BD8DF0-6511-4A59-B3D5-8276FA4A6351@gmail.com> <A852AD08368B4F6B949E88DEEB02EF2C@your029b8cecfe>
In-Reply-To: <A852AD08368B4F6B949E88DEEB02EF2C@your029b8cecfe>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Signature: e0cdef1f45f89a40ad608d255b27e7d5c668495a22bd047932e4050276cad420
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Signature: e0cdef1f45f89a40ad608d255b27e7d5c668495a22bd047932e4050276cad420
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 14:20:47 -0000
Adrian, > I have absolutely no doubt of the integrity of the IAOC and its chair, but this > rule is somewhat vague and open to interpretation. It is like using the word > "appropriate" in a protocol spec! Yes, true, but this is really a rare exception. In the 1.5 years that I've been on the IAOC, I don't remember a case where expenses were made and reimbursed. That makes it hard to be more precise here. > Could you look at qualifying this in some way to scope the exceptional > circumstances. Perhaps payment of expenses would be made only if the payment has > been agreed before the expense was incurred? If the IAOC members wanted to claim expenses that should not be reimbursed, this rule would be easy to circumvent. If this is a concern, then I'd suggest that the IAOC simply publishes what expenses were paid. Henk -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.xs4all.nl/~henku P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I confirm today what I denied yesterday. Anonymous Politician.
- Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Bob Hinden
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Bob Hinden
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Adrian Farrel
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Bob Hinden
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Adrian Farrel
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Bob Hinden
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Steve Crocker
- Re: Revised IAOC Administrative Procedures draft Dave CROCKER