Re: Topic IPv6

Alexander Nevalennyy <avnevalenniy@gmail.com> Mon, 21 November 2016 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <avnevalenniy@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C645E1296BC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:44:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tsSrGqkdmSyn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:44:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 459671296B4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:44:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id n204so356175566qke.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:44:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8PRlUx5vEFtwrubxE+POP+CswUe3FjGn4VlyOF8/VPY=; b=d4Xke0ZDxesw58qdaOKhqtSidvB8R38vUmP3JNv8C9JTp6MgmRwNjv8jpXvWY7U2RW abyfhU0dDevayOtbVc2AxUrlUe6LfsM3Uolbxt33Ak2M0t4ELBqRwV4ZKjjsH5htdood aqJGrQ02e+9ERhG5DUMJc3mMeXizBZP+pI7U27zSFy23UT11Z01aeFSGNad7rXYfSMtV leD3XStzG3bXXtuYu4eGfNBdgKOxybCTplHARzIntT4QWd1S73cFNpYn5A+ZBr8LDBDy lwaFiD7hz8FI0fBBldj0daxWUW0iXn/0Ss3gEr61fYjGCMBoagukvNillQYNsK1IQvse ZaSA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=8PRlUx5vEFtwrubxE+POP+CswUe3FjGn4VlyOF8/VPY=; b=VniivBTvn5HZIVaKWFLUWUhiTKf9cQCuELhADQrQ0QL/2d1F9ONQcBOITEi5tMnBtE hU/TLr0yDk3o7v6D87iELkWIQW5XYIQS3YZ0Vu1EEgvX2d7rP1Os0ByzIg2PhM+1IR11 joMt4NW77VrFCCj5K7x3bYNUWGFeKsrJdHaS/JhwZa1kskk+vMGm2jAXxxE7fvOVNdk3 KVVaDnCGO0Xlra8kGpBPOzJglHHxR+ZpD2dIQxN0jOFjFF/mhLSBI8Nr3XwV1R8jMgMd AFiggH45BZ9WmD0HuDbRgPsc6RABSTA/Zm7AUita8wMsTtfScgnd8DQxLc58ITiIBLSC Tlvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02taZvXL80VDYBq6jOMvYWMV1EOngQZDlFmR5DHa0frNil77YaaDp3rO3+07X7DCYQhrDRBx1Oc5mPVTA==
X-Received: by 10.55.161.21 with SMTP id k21mr16838881qke.149.1479743089195; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:44:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.170.20 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:44:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGxDXJ_zAXt_QD8vpW29vShV1enXewQ1sshZfOQd+WMU17=DTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGxDXJ9L-Zfu+Wn8MogOn_yKgDKKuUVyqNp5mxNYaJZd-371qA@mail.gmail.com> <20161121135800.hj773gvjquay7ka5@nic.fr> <CAGxDXJ_j+U2yngKPqK+ciHSG9B2CsTRYPq8swqbVZZBOfYB37Q@mail.gmail.com> <20161121145039.p56dd5cpczxaivyl@nic.fr> <CAGxDXJ_zAXt_QD8vpW29vShV1enXewQ1sshZfOQd+WMU17=DTA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexander Nevalennyy <avnevalenniy@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:44:48 +0300
Message-ID: <CAGxDXJ-Hkvfh=E_C8ReqBE-LoN+cRR9g5d=ZnusapoNSw3i8yQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topic IPv6
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05fde630be020541d189e1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xAdK1M9hR6TBNAYqFexosG_3zeE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:44:52 -0000

Does anybody want to help me with writing Internet-draft?
It saves emotions and time of a lot of engineers.
I will be glad if somebody help me. Maybe, my idea is not great, but have a
chance as other ideas.

2016-11-21 18:02 GMT+03:00 Alexander Nevalennyy <avnevalenniy@gmail.com>:

> I know differences between anonimity and pseudonymity.
> But you told about protect your rights. Working pheudonymously your
> realize your rights. Nobody instead of judge can share information IP of
> individual.
> I am opened, but what must I share to provide serious conversation?
>
> 2016-11-21 17:50 GMT+03:00 Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:39:37PM +0300,
>>  Alexander Nevalennyy <avnevalenniy@gmail.com> wrote
>>  a message of 126 lines which said:
>>
>> > 1. Again, it is not about privacy. When you work with IPv6 address,
>> > nobody knows that it was you, like with numbers of cell phones (if
>> > you did not share information).
>>
>> You really should read a few texts about privacy. Here, you make the
>> traditional error of mixing anonymity (no tracability) and
>> pseudonymity (identifiers which are not your official name).
>>
>> > We are here to discuss but not only criticize (it is too simple).
>>
>> We cannot discuss on the basis of just a few slides. Either you have a
>> serious proposal, and it can be discussed and criticized, or you just
>> have a few slides and, then, I can say that I spent as much time on
>> this proposal as you have spent writing it.
>>
>
>