Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Sat, 29 March 2014 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CAE1A0450 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hNb7rHKpIzSn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x236.google.com (mail-oa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8FA51A02A9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n16so7480476oag.41 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=d8+51r0ZKqyO0a2J1X6faTMv2vZFp+DRSNY9xgKyQJU=; b=Wwpp5T+e532sEk7vzJOFeDr+VY6JZo+A48621bUeyJFQEqlWQQkC4rlvIneW3T8rxT 7CwTeq82NsvjrU19Uc3v7/hABRm0QcTdTzxzH9cqc4GyRuu5mOfYBIwIeRwepLowVUuR eBT1AtpxFN2X6OagTlUzCcSmFI7GB9zr5ghV5CNqS+h7h6ia+UpcPebGr5xsPD3/AyEe +3z8ADcH9Ou1fC4171W0ddDoRAy/0hyVSf6pfLKlFV62fyfX5TLq5g+rk+xMwfvKWOUr YrobD5t9QoNZeWg0mdZoi8Mz4NCk9mB0t1oX5fy1rwYtCYkBK9pz0n9oV8O3W5BTyiCv 14ig==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.55.97 with SMTP id r1mr12753472oep.5.1396111423036; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.48.9 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.48.9 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5336F1EF.1020203@dcrocker.net>
References: <mailman.1570.1395964793.2468.ietf@ietf.org> <53366F34.8050501@ageispolis.net> <5336979B.6000102@cisco.com> <0AF4D5B8-C99C-4944-87FA-A458D6CE67D9@nominum.com> <5336F1EF.1020203@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:43:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP9nFmYfondSrqA7ETkhvCMe4YrqRjOdGZuPiLz2kZzXrw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0115f08a6fe38e04f5c18533"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xKRp5P61GLsr8Dg9z378kSUQ4ss
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 16:43:47 -0000

I think the privacy beach from exposing intermediate steps is small, and in
some cases knowledge of the routing may be required by law.