IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [admin-discuss] IETF LLC & IETF Participation from USA-sanctioned countries

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 04 March 2021 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E76E3A0BFC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:38:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tcAT77aQN2tX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:38:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A9C03A0BF9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 16:38:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C7916FB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:38:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:38:23 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=UCsFw5EevvdxzP9l5v7P1PMG+Rz2vyF5ag8W6SKYQ xA=; b=btbjvgDGHYtC4SN9J3aNRWFCwvROsHzJGcxO2RbbHah5UMsFMjFq4ytg4 b+X/EXkVvjVo/p8iHOd0zKQUFReh1/k1cpuJ7ME92hGb54PKeXtpC0TCD33xEgTD j4LqfGX8JjD+k/FluMnu+jT21oif7rkPqAzZ8Cuj1YSPhpsVa5O9bI581wG/vVNn A8sEgj1/v8x6Nej/0GF81IHHVbSkkSIW7kxQnnnPO2Ch3DYRZL8zIpWSuQcSFyGK UyYmx/n81NfIp+7IbQTEP9+Ks5suHNA0I2IQsQcFbUNnk9W5JzpOgpjkvlTd0kA1 EGaFH6yLCSrUfd0i8CTnbIchkACOg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:_StAYJ36cGrMoIfrp9OXf6HVeVW8j6qdhvfjb28fYyOwEvMBJ7JdjQ> <xme:_StAYPqWh_H08d9SxFRcyUy7_wRiLXWFLTuqhV3VxMa9F3oYAS8BFo0zzKQ9GrSNO eInldblLbl2Zw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddtfedgvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtke ertddtfeehnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeehudfhleduge euteevvefhueejjeefffefteettddvleefgfekieekheejffdvffenucfkphepuddtkedr vddvuddrudektddrudehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:_StAYM367Md6LeaP-b5aKqqZSK3e_KNXeFpzg3P7z8w04jd-nkLVGQ> <xmx:_StAYFmXFryOaUuV-ICjasv7HUBAPCNLP3JFWJ30PJky6vhtwrTQPQ> <xmx:_StAYBSMo-8w7SBQa3GzUoRTSsxiPplhUs5WkJaF_PWeRgWPqTVjlg> <xmx:_itAYNCYbl-vERa84u3OK7IIQ-2AClMDOzTfqVflm3usg2XXD8HSpw>
Received: from [192.168.1.90] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D09061080066 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:38:20 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [admin-discuss] IETF LLC & IETF Participation from USA-sanctioned countries
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <4619acc8-1ed4-52e8-849b-bfda9de61bb0@gont.com.ar> <976AFF7C-4DDC-4EF5-874C-AA7526A00A2C@ietf.org> <4685ae0b-0ce9-0bc6-e50f-9f280af543be@si6networks.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <40408b5d-3696-a28c-3e35-d0b543e6535b@network-heretics.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:38:19 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4685ae0b-0ce9-0bc6-e50f-9f280af543be@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xMOBd36SpQ8uyPjJR1g_epRJOTA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:38:25 -0000

On 3/3/21 7:15 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:

> Put another way: would a fee waiver guarantee f2f/online meeting
> participation of individuals from USA-sanctioned countries, as far as
> the IETF LLC is concerned? 

It might be the case that a fee waiver from IETF would still be 
interpreted as an exchange of value.   Clearly IETF/ISOC has to be very 
careful about such things.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email