IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: The RFC Acknowledgement (off-topic)

Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name> Tue, 12 February 2013 03:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich@herberg.name>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653A321F8891 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:08:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.245, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ekXSeYVhuu6n for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:08:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D1721F8887 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:08:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id kp1so3391172pab.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:08:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herberg.name; s=dkim; h=x-received:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=dUnE9V5uhcdqktyfIJYSlWypym03okRdJSIn1n7OUIc=; b=FFTllZEMtpLri6VLJ5slB9Lg3X5/ynzpstXRwy4A46gPmUrXiARAXq3ptn8FgoqEPF THJSlH11sjG6R/WOOnF8yBCPgzqgUdGV31N5bBhRcJf1Sqe0YTyp/h1elT1Kby8cA6Gk oMTTMQM0HQ//w5MuX05b2FfpGQkytu2oFlBoo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to:x-gm-message-state; bh=dUnE9V5uhcdqktyfIJYSlWypym03okRdJSIn1n7OUIc=; b=pYtCiuhpJOaVXMVMCV69WF/NFcrzFbfel94OmYR7lyJeUYcexHSRHyay5cNynGRAlW KQ5lTzgPzWyTlLk/MRUK4SDTZxCHQ7wGQ7Wplm8lewJBG6ZfPVyWoTS8nrW9ij/UjcY6 ipU9KJoWxZbpQKWMYHdCC8UFqvdqZQCMuOV4UYuKEUK2bLHq/a/U6Ew3EF0XNniMHaYY LLcPQkh8xCXquUcSVky3ZkT4jdLKrjwLvOPo7ESGZh+UEzRIfXZCz+rTAILhL56yBXYQ Qi1aXDLKciINCAI4W43CAelNLe2bluTAilFcwFhqPLF6JUK35kVN0TCdL+k2BpFvxX+b HEeA==
X-Received: by 10.66.86.71 with SMTP id n7mr47334019paz.77.1360638512188; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:08:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:9:3d00:65:f9fa:5bfa:ff3d:f4ff? ([2601:9:3d00:65:f9fa:5bfa:ff3d:f4ff]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z6sm45137701pav.3.2013.02.11.19.08.29 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:08:31 -0800 (PST)
References: <CADnDZ8_E-cDqhXWV-f3MjoDo9hFeCVAdVTmRQ+McA--_3smyJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEFGdiwFiRkVtUQLR6b89c3SdpVcOmHULe35hwd+wg8CsA@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_wCFNsWXdQv29RpVrFnzZLeuBybaBEPR63OvUxw-ieyQ@mail.gmail.com> <51180ad8.0727dc0a.7e34.ffffeb5cSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <CADnDZ89ckeZzVzU7d_ru=9U9qdhQ=R6rmJRteHDj0SwDw+jv6g@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130211104011.0b8299d0@resistor.net> <CAK=bVC9=vmtTvdrj93gMtJA_7yih9BOzQbCURH-2zaVFuoHG7g@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130211143859.0956a928@resistor.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130211143859.0956a928@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BBF1A71A-3476-4B86-BD5E-5646204F9A3E@herberg.name>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A403)
From: Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>
Subject: Re: The RFC Acknowledgement (off-topic)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:08:31 -0800
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmgDVHjJtCC3ZrMcWxCrhWmhLYYfNcM/xgrfCKUiM4dqwdNb3IjD359DmKaxMMI9PyzqJwz
Cc: "Sandra L. Cespedes" <slcesped@bbcr.uwaterloo.ca>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:08:40 -0000

Alright, thanks

Ulrich

On Feb 11, 2013, at 15:36, SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote:

> Hi Ulrich,
> At 13:25 11-02-2013, Ulrich Herberg wrote:
>> (it is generally appreciated in the IETF to use real first and last name).
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Your comment reminded me of the message at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/domainrep/current/msg00085.html
> 
>> Generally, I think the topic has been well summarized by Fred and
>> others, and I don't see how continuing it would generate new value.
>> See below:
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>> I am not sure what this is about because it does not seem related to
>> this discussion. But since I am the editor of the mentioned document,
> 
> It was a gentle note to one of the authors (see Note 4).
> 
> I pointed to two reviews about a draft and mentioned that the first one was clearer to me.
> 
>> I still wonder what you mean but "the person [has] zero reputation".
>> There is a related topic on this mailing list about the mentioned
>> draft, so I suggest sending your comments as reply to that thread.
> 
> I agree that it is better to stick to the topic.  I'll answer in here as to avoid generating two messages.  I meant that I have never interacted with the person through email or in person.  There is less bias [1].  The content of the message matters; it does not matter who wrote it.
> 
> Regards,
> -sm
> 
> 1. www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mckinley/notes/snodgrass-tods-2007.pdf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email