IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 11 May 2021 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413003A2A30; Tue, 11 May 2021 16:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zgxTsEJeF5Dk; Tue, 11 May 2021 16:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C705A3A2A2B; Tue, 11 May 2021 16:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dcb12.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.203.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Ffv0762jbz315V; Wed, 12 May 2021 01:15:03 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Subject: Re: Updated IESG Statement "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FEB3D6F-E635-43FD-8DE4-FCE2B18F9775@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 01:15:03 +0200
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3958D60C-2A4A-4B03-A3C9-C8ECF33786AC@tzi.org>
References: <A3EDA8207BC7C8BE22C9A00C@PSB> <4FEB3D6F-E635-43FD-8DE4-FCE2B18F9775@gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xQywovvQNC6L5uDKjtm_mwneweY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 23:15:12 -0000

On 11. May 2021, at 23:51, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> In  the majority of cases the resolution of an erratum  is a simple obvious fix. 

Simple, obvious, and wrong? [1]

SCNR, but it sure makes sense to discuss such a fix in a wider audience.

Grüße, Carsten

[1]: https://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/07/17/solution/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email