Re: Gather.town hour every month?

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 26 March 2021 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699973A21A9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hs8ExB9H9top for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E17E3A219C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id l15so6367469ybm.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=I/ygRcwo3MNJxpns3BI3p74r0ZZf5rfvGBJpzHf/WnA=; b=X3BVWsBM10BxO8/JW4mslF8zPL/8HsoHgRcMb8CJhxRux4Bk1BLqeD3M1AOyzqB1Fl iLSFMDzY6XqyG7K0TAYVlKlRYtmXZfvDJUYVL7XuZ/6KJboAYPXVmuvh5MbfkyPlNwQV agXQeoAgtR7zbNX1GyR8Hf8dRZo4AzXj0jJLSt/I3/oaGQjRbqrZqpImvwpzQVlNVhRm NC8lFvem3jStRWhWlV5+vh/S0z40NgEqvtlacwmiNYW3pFb80FjFFQQJU2hUBhANYC8X TvrsbQgwIChoySyq/pqZhCk97hxRp/iiGsOITWNA4z95Oyc/ZzR5RKSy766H0ANbM7pO Xkzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=I/ygRcwo3MNJxpns3BI3p74r0ZZf5rfvGBJpzHf/WnA=; b=UF1ePEpp04dT8iHBRauutrNVpQ1t53qAIkc/q9gXKazxU9rbEWRpDNkGhmK1IR5FON h1VcxteNWrVsU1nF48f8ltfnpvulnXpG166C3QI2aKkkGanT6spycFA2JWex9lDg3DqZ Eq1eAm3xt/iHqKqtgEnY0HGbpzVVpsIKTyULDlvXkdbilUTz8Hb5nQ5KPzzqaLzS8/r0 S2/mnbCpP3Lwli5paIAQPAZEUoCQkkgI4rf0AOBXkryQOIyfDeLUW/Yfp8YMvAw99M2C 41gzJjli+adMkbk+tSD9JzRgtLG0UR5xQfjxgjkLXrt8brMx7BTTjWuDXE0m8SpbjtgW 0RYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+/7nQ9wLAYjcAnJiqn9J6SOaEkgBLoKFQPcGp/UUwOA9S55q1 9KpRGKDi6ldrlM/JZ6QKagwa1TssfEywGaCzrUJdwkwf
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeDxQBPwsrjzaZeGn1NKpTV2yxj5wStlxRh/gMcwWq1PdD3pzvKpltLC0BDK9tStHURkk7ij3fXQIGPsTg14M=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4444:: with SMTP id r65mr21088965yba.84.1616773627237; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <738E6E6B-BD7E-46A2-8E92-BA32EF19836A@tzi.org> <20210315120032.GA42031@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <3F1414A9-C93F-4EBD-B221-4F5EF312C6F8@tzi.org> <20210315122926.GB42031@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <24355.1615820917@localhost> <20210315164103.GC42031@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <7E215F5B-84CE-4EBE-BBEA-7EBC694CE466@tzi.org> <MN2PR11MB43669DC7A79E34DEEC3A597BB56C9@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB43669DC7A79E34DEEC3A597BB56C9@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:46:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-dUbGxOu5xNq4dMXWjN+DHXGNz1J8u8cVAy=8xJxyQuvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Gather.town hour every month?
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bbdb3b05be72719a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xb3GREbf_J28SrHTXlbBOP2Hx5E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:47:19 -0000

FWIW ...

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:40 PM Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi Carsten,
>
> I think that what you propose is a good idea.  Or at least, it is worth
> trying to see what happens.
>

I also like Carsten's suggestion. What follows is one thing we could do,
within the scope of his suggestion (we could do other things as well, of
course).


> The timezones issue is of course tricky.
>
> For a given 'day', I would suggest that we organize 3 sessions 8 hours
> apart, and then folks can join one or more depending on their time zones.
> E.g., perhaps something like 2am, 10am, & 6 pm UTC.
>

I've ended up as a co-chair in ART, and a couple of IETFs ago, the ART ADs
had a gathering for the ART chairs, that was scheduled very much like you
suggested (observing that the ART chairs spanned the globe, so three
sessions with start times at about 8 hour intervals, lasting a couple of
hours each). So there's at least prior art about that.

Somewhat counterintuitively, I was on two of those three slots (and I think
others were on more than one slot, as well). So ISTM that there are people
who want to talk to people outside their preferred timezone, if it's not
too painful. Perhaps that would be easier, if the three slots weren't back
to back on the same day.


> I would probably try and keep it at the same weekday/times each month,
> since that is easier to put in a calendar.
>
> Sending out a reminder the day before may also encourage participation.
>

I also note that we didn't have a HotRFC session for IETF 110, which I've
found VERY helpful in moving new work proposals forward. I wonder if having
monthly HotRFC sessions between IETF meetings would be better than trying
to cram them in just before/during IETF meetings.

Best,

Spencer