Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 20 July 2009 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCA93A6D69 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O5DcT2l-PCZZ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47F93A6D3C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAC8HZEqQ/uCL/2dsb2JhbACBUbZBiCOOJAWEDIlT
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,234,1246838400"; d="scan'208";a="178080126"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2009 13:01:08 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n6KD17m6032023; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:01:07 +0200
Received: from adsl-247-5-fixip.tiscali.ch (ams3-vpn-dhcp7005.cisco.com [10.61.91.92]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6KD17WT020004; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:01:07 GMT
Message-ID: <4A646A90.1020100@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:01:04 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090602 Shredder/3.0b3pre
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Trustees] Proposed Revisions to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
References: <20090719112919.BCF4C1AABBDC@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20090719112919.BCF4C1AABBDC@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=573; t=1248094867; x=1248958867; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=From:=20Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Trustees]=20Proposed=20Revisions=20to= 20the=20IETF=20Trust=20Legal=20Provisions=0A=20(TLP) |Sender:=20; bh=hxR0E/2SkqZJZxjKQXY/1QnnW02UMhAvue9qOHyIwjc=; b=G0LkOFFBa0fFMOnadHIMRq2Cnrlsj4vvkUjCZDWtf0F8Fuqj8mK3mxIyL3 OsRp6hz9itQOlxcJhrsH9x2alwuPilIuSSvQ1q+Usdqt6upr7cRwpSA6sbFj Q1YcvrNUQ5;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: henk@ripe.net, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:01:12 -0000

On 7/19/09 1:29 PM, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
>> Isn't this what has essentially happened in this case?
>>      
> I did not see a statement from the IETF asking for changes
> nor did I see a statement from the Trust saying that there
> are these issues that need to be fixed for legal or cosmetic
> reasons
>    

This would have helped me as well.  Supposedly the changes would help 
one of my WG authors but I don't see how.  So I've had to refer the 
matter to my corporate legal people who have not gotten back to me, and 
so I have a draft stall.

Eliot