Re: Generalist ADs?
joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Sat, 28 March 2015 16:02 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597CA1A895C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQi3hqP0V8U4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E41DF1A8947 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mb-aye.local ([IPv6:2601:9:3402:7bb1:89fd:4691:6f2c:f65d]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2SG2N1Q027454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Mar 2015 16:02:24 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Subject: Re: Generalist ADs?
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
references: <CAKKJt-d3B3b4w1tOW_jhF1=5dT3D17DWn=yn_yzbc1xE2K7oSg@mail.gmail.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949364263F1@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
message-id: <5516D08E.4010905@bogus.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 09:02:22 -0700
user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:37.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/37.0
mime-version: 1.0
in-reply-to: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949364263F1@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="O1GEsw3MChjwndsrC7GOgrmlEhMJ3gsHb"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xjE3tvb6uW3tMEjXad5M3ub-cg8>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 16:02:32 -0000
On 3/26/15 10:38 AM, Black, David wrote: > Hi Spencer, > > > > I usually leave “silly rabbit ...” lines to the ADs - they’re better at > that than I am ;-). > > > > Currently, with the exception of the IETF Chair, ADs are selected with a > strong focus on specific expertise in an Area. I was suggesting adding > a few “At-Large” ADs who would be selected with a strong focus on > generalist skills, and I think I saw other comments in favor of adding > generalists to the IESG during discussion of the initial area merge > proposal. > > > > The At-Large ADs could serve as out-of-area ADs to spread the WG > management load. In addition, the existence of At-Large AD positions > could help the NomCom; if for some Area, the preferable slate of new AD > candidates and continuing ADs is missing an important chunk of > expertise, perhaps one of the good At-Large AD candidates would have > that expertise. > > > > Thanks, > --David The job description I wrote for the operations and management AD role to be filled this time was the following... this is probably one of the more, if not most generalist AD role. ** Operations and Management AD ** The primary technical areas covered by the Operations and Management Area include: Network Management, AAA, and various operational issues facing the deployed Internet such as DNS operation, IPv6 operation, routing operation and operational security. Unlike most IETF areas, the Operations and Management Area is logically divided into two separate functions: Network Management and Operations. This year, the Operation AD role is open, so specific expertise desired for the open position includes a strong understanding of or experience with the operation of large scale transit or access networks and services, as well as edge networks. Among the other areas, the Operations portion of the OPS area intersects most often with the Routing, Internet and Security areas. Desired characteristics for this position includes an understanding of AAA protocols, network management protocols and their deployed uasge, DNS and Routing with respect to topics covered by working groups in the Ops area. There is an expectation that an operations AD will be reasonably conversant (generalist) with the full stack associated with internet services without necessarily being a domain expert. Another important role of the Operations and Management AD is to identify potential or actual management or operational issues regarding IETF protocols and documents in all Areas, and to work with the other Areas to resolve those issues. This implies a strong understanding of how new and updated protocols should be managed, including aspects related to configuration, monitoring and alarms. It also implies a good understanding of the operational environment in which protocols are used, a cross-area comprehension of the Internet architecture, and a knowledge of IETF protocols. Note that breadth of technical ability is perhaps more important than specific technical expertise. Cross-area expertise in any Area would be useful. Security as part of network operations and network management is an important topic. The Operations and Management Area also interacts with the operator community, operator organizations like NANOG, RIPE, and other SDOs doing work in network management.
- Generalist ADs? Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- RE: Generalist ADs? Black, David
- Re: Generalist ADs? Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Generalist ADs? Keith Moore
- Re: Generalist ADs? joel jaeggli