Re: BCP97bis
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sat, 16 October 2021 06:51 UTC
Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C453A045E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5uK9DfurB1QK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92e.google.com (mail-ua1-x92e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 731363A041A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92e.google.com with SMTP id i15so961669uap.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Dz/anMedMZlDLcbSaZdgXB41zY3BKJmcQpzL3F3Kbxk=; b=b7B7CFLqfPo8Kgn27hLA3AxfsNc+2v/NAcoU91o8J5HrgzTm38UEcFDOYuwj8b+7J9 F7XeLbX+VTwW6YfbEq3u888KBMroPYqUasGTdQSFS8K0ajWaUveg4/vPVoyk7mRvW9Fx S3yBr57igZO4DqPzrVz7pAlku99/mhXrbJ668q69CKZ8tuEHSS3xAW/9E1Yw91lqRUkt kcH8Xzaxb8NzIAOj6ooDnesioq5USER8BSmSsu9EixK4FWe77zJFQn5HbaB/Yq+Jbb8W ovvH+k1zShlWoEv48nM/IgN4nwzfzVRCs8V+wt1iCHaO+FTGRnN/qLiAm6t37dNDTsVS YYXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Dz/anMedMZlDLcbSaZdgXB41zY3BKJmcQpzL3F3Kbxk=; b=B+/os7CzdhMS7HS/PtmiH/lKkiFgK2K7cijdUcUPfXRDxlxTMhMKNUtpfjWq9qaOH3 2UcK6big2b1aDL3bP9EA0rSwSHVIB3NcGWFRKFr6TBLLrQScpwihVfyZdEsA8CgSzVEL rWAbtJENj3p/vlwTqhPnmNq3oYvKXVW3o+XwpGGGGZVzwwtE8JXPfsKEBwmLY+o301A+ N0M0vK8E5Glyw5GNsf5puyKcIqx708mHKDktWU3YbGG6EiX48W4oWZde55Mc1PJAVJtN DzxkIwidOAxa4nXxHLKPlsOl52+GGCmkQuJj6HZlc3RzWGwD63J6N+6IpQ4jtvw6nLOd gvPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323Rm8aH5ir7Sbf9h61xxwbBCITrS4yNLd31h7rQ9RsS3dQEco8 zl9c1+dvFLfFESlr3JxYDIAKm5bzOQtoHSRLhaV2ib9b
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfJ+lSH1Kym6lW7q5SUDGdWdXp5CHMPVosOJfKwZVqDFNz/vO39EZTQWBv7B00MtmjowmJH4nloL/XsVOv+So=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:3a82:: with SMTP id r2mr16576393uaw.101.1634367101182; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwbwvs2Cp_urgJ=hzc6yEMGDaz3C0xf6RQXRrB89wAx=Rw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwavK5dYdmYPVxdMT5rA=jBZv1cEyAsVBEWOD7p9MoZR1g@mail.gmail.com> <A0343309-3371-405C-A039-161D8787966B@sobco.com> <CAL0qLwY69dHZZwkWHXDuHMQtiYe8QCqQNnP2a9CFsDNfp-CWSA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau3x4nwtd0m5zABH_mzdsHeVuvbRx4WzV2m5QbEXXgpXpQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau3x4nwtd0m5zABH_mzdsHeVuvbRx4WzV2m5QbEXXgpXpQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:51:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaHTZXA=ksj9gsCxqxofcrxYuwLhGuKCxoJQ6Fes1gsPw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BCP97bis
To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Cc: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007fa61f05ce72be95"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xnNpx9na2vx5uYKKdywLVFrbrbc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 06:51:48 -0000
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:50 PM David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> wrote: > Actually, RFC 1818 is marked Historic and RFC 2026 Section 5 has a much > more complete discussion of the purpose of a BCP and the processes > associated with them, at least in my opinion Ah, you're right. I overlooked that annotation. Thanks. -MSK
- BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Russ Housley
- Re: BCP97bis Scott Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis David Farmer
- Re: BCP97bis Brian Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Scott Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis Russ Housley
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and Informational-as-Standard Michael Richardson
- RE: BCP97bis Larry Masinter
- Re: BCP97bis Joel M. Halpern
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis Brian E Carpenter
- RE: BCP97bis Larry Masinter
- Re: BCP97bis John Levine
- Re: BCP97bis Scott Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis Russ Housley
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis tom petch
- RE: BCP97bis mohamed.boucadair
- RE: BCP97bis ned+ietf
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- BCP97bis and "freely available" John C Klensin
- RE: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- RE: BCP97bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem tom petch
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Warren Kumari
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Lars Eggert
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Warren Kumari
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Scott O. Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" John C Klensin
- BCP written by another AD [was Re: BCP97bis] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Sandy Wills
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Michael StJohns
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" George Michaelson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Randy Presuhn
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" George Michaelson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Michael Richardson
- RE: BCP97bis ned+ietf
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" tom petch
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem tom petch
- Re: BCP written by another AD [was Re: BCP97bis] Erik Kline
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy