Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace

Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com> Wed, 05 August 2020 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <surfer@mauigateway.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2253C3A0F8D; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y3QogSl89XHZ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imta-38.everyone.net (imta-37.everyone.net [216.200.145.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E02AC3A0F8B; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 075L0BAP031488; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:06:41 -0700
X-Eon-Originating-Account: N2BeW33aLt64I7zzHxb5yT_7-xYUUeonGCkxkDRla68I1PvA7MmECKIgSMEe9MhV
X-Eon-Dm: m0116954.ppops.net
Received: by m0117566.mta.everyone.net (EON-PICKUP) id m0117566.5ef2451c.2c15a; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:06:40 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200805140637.E25A7DFC@m0117566.ppops.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 14:06:37 -0700
From: Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com>
Reply-To: surfer@mauigateway.com
To: ietf@ietf.org, manycouches@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
X-Eon-Sig: AQLAznNfKx9gi+gReAEAAAAC,348a3aa2b9447b602ed4363408e35d20
X-Eip: qWZnwMLR-wWivO_i9o-RJzg1x8eHVC-xWgTR3ax82QM
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-08-05_18:2020-08-03, 2020-08-05 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2006250000 definitions=main-2008050160
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xpjhMsOWREEyjRI7bIe1TaVh68E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 21:06:44 -0000


--- mknodel@cdt.org wrote:
On 8/4/20 3:00 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:24:02PM -0700, Theresa Enghardt wrote:
>> As an experiment, there is now a Slack workspace at 
>> https://ietf.slack.com, which provides a persistent chat platform 
>> with ad-hoc channel creation.
> Is anyone preparing a review or summary of the outcome of the 
> experiment? (I did not participate in the experiment, myself, thus 
> cannot contribute to such a report.)

Same-- I didn't use Slack during the week, but I would be very 
interested to know how it went.
-------------------------------------------------------


Since no one else answered, I will.  I was on it just to see how it
worked.  A few newbies said hello.  Some minor discussions and some 
funny stuff (In #random someone sent 106bLo0fZflMnnMlsBYNA36WZVvr 
and a short discussion started about /dev/urandom) happened.  All
in all I didn't see too much going on when compared to the mailing 
list activity.

scott