IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10

"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Fri, 05 May 2017 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5241F1294D3; Fri, 5 May 2017 03:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RfgpFvhUJ_1y; Fri, 5 May 2017 03:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F7D4129494; Fri, 5 May 2017 03:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=490; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1493979041; x=1495188641; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=6fgWWXgrLGODipEaRFnPqE7Lv9VKfrai0wFqmrHJlIY=; b=LYjymKMQlCHAZrR/NdAATWrUonv+qwNmF8EueKr214dFyNyyyK92LX8z xWk70toT5w1gtwHeP0yfTfd+1eAKTrg7E7ZU0JUwLFmBwQZlAppIE14O7 zLUubYRDqvz3V5EhpvJdgoZepu8CSE/bTPhVICD8GXu5Cbh3Z9huARCjv Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BBAQAvTgxZ/5NdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1WBbgeDYYoYkVeIIo1Ogg+GJAIahCw/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRUBAQEBAgEjEUUFCwIBCBgCAiYCAgIfERUQAgQBDQWKCAMNCLERgiaHKg2DLgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2BC4VUgV4rgnCCVIUVLoIxAQSdNDsBjkSEUoFsAY97iyOJEwEfOIEKbxVYAYZfdodogQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,292,1491264000"; d="scan'208";a="422199871"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 May 2017 10:10:40 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (xch-rtp-005.cisco.com [64.101.220.145]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v45AAe3I024908 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 May 2017 10:10:40 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 5 May 2017 06:10:39 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) by XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 5 May 2017 06:10:39 -0400
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
CC: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10
Thread-Topic: [spring] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10
Thread-Index: AQHSxRPsenC9nUhN5Uqlm4iwP4zQyaHlw3QAgAAFHwA=
Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 10:10:39 +0000
Message-ID: <B91C6D2C-897A-404C-80B3-EAA8BDEC4414@cisco.com>
References: <149374426742.21414.16408814015665498739@ietfa.amsl.com> <3E209B45-90CE-4EEB-9D2B-E14EFE28DCE0@cisco.com> <87a1534f-079d-3707-9f5d-9327e831bf7a@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <87a1534f-079d-3707-9f5d-9327e831bf7a@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.108.100]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D3A25BE6182C184FB902973E454FD477@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xru3DVVbkZfIWe464Sc1rTkm8Hs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 10:10:44 -0000

> On May 5, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Alternatively maybe it would be better to have a single use case: Operators that wish to deploy SR without an MPLS control plane,


I’d agree with the above. Let’s simplify the document with, at the end, what is the simplest and most evident use case.

s.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email