Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 05 March 2013 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECFF11E8101 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:33:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vh9b9Lo2BfYU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:33:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E41A11E80FA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:33:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-9-215.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.9.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r25IXPCD009829 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:33:26 -0800
Message-ID: <51363A71.7040702@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:33:21 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Subject: Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director
References: <21B86E13-B8DA-4119-BBB1-B5EE6D2B5C1D@ietf.org> <51330179.3040500@gmail.com> <919840EE-BEC8-4F82-8D3C-B116698A4262@gmx.net> <1D88E6E9-33DE-4C4D-89F4-B0B762155D6F@standardstrack.com> <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F77BA46@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <3CB8992B-212A-4776-95FE-71CA1E382FFF@standardstrack.com> <513376DB.7000200@dcrocker.net> <E22ACC99-B465-4769-8B59-BB98A7BA93DF@gmx.net> <79E77523-3D92-4CE9-8689-483D416794EF@standardstrack.com> <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F780D2F@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <071C6ED7-352C-4E74-A483-F5E7A3270FA5@gmail.com> <C726E531-57DC-4C42-9053-1394983126D6@vigilsec.com> <5134D5A0.4050209@gmail.com> <tsllia3m5lh.fsf@mit.edu> <5134F720.5010507@cisco.com> <tsl1ubvlywt.fsf@mit.edu> <CAHBDyN6AM-_b2HMrmmQQVuhxFc-_Rfpfg0=r38mkcJ4zqoJeTw@mail.gmail.com> <tslr4julxmh.fsf@mit.edu> <1C1C0842-BF6A-4A3F-A312-35CF0A994793@lilacglade.org> <51351E0B.5050901@dcrocker.net> <51363964.2080003@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <51363964.2080003@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:33:26 -0800 (PST)
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:33:30 -0000

Joe,

On 3/5/2013 10:28 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
> On 3/4/2013 2:19 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>
> ...
>>       ADs do not 'lead' the work of their area.  They do not initiate
>> the work, produce the charters or write the specifications.  Work that
>> fails or succeeds does so because it has community consensus and demand,
>> not because an AD was diligent or clever.  The job of an AD is to
>> facilitate community efforts, not to direct them.
>
> ADs also comprise the IESG, which reviews RFCs before publication.
>
> We should not expect to appoint IESG members that need a tutorial on
> basic protocol principles. Further, if the TSV AD can't stand up for
> cong control and other TSV-specific work or TSV-specific concerns raised
> on other drafts, then who will?


If you can explain how your note relates to mine, I'd appreciate it.

You appear to be responding to a point that has been raised elsewhere in 
the discussion (by others), but has nothing at all to do with the points 
I was making.

Best I can guess is that you somehow think that because I didn't mention 
something I meant that it didn't matter.  If so, please re-target your 
note because that would be a bad reading.

d/

-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net