IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF privacy policy - update

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 06 July 2010 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEF83A69DF for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QuQBnQyhw7dx for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535913A69DE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.192.181] (c-98-234-104-156.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.104.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o66LjhWx071209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 6 Jul 2010 21:45:44 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4C33A406.1090801@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:45:42 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Subject: Re: IETF privacy policy - update
References: <7022DEA1-7FC0-4D77-88CE-FA3788720B43@cdt.org> <8FBEA0C7-9B80-4860-AFAE-FB5A19E660EF@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <8FBEA0C7-9B80-4860-AFAE-FB5A19E660EF@muada.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:45:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:46:01 -0000

On 2010-07-06 03:56, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 5 jul 2010, at 18:05, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
>> 1) Respond on this list if you support the idea of the IETF having
>> a privacy policy (a simple "+1" will do).
>
> I'm torn between "good to have this written down" and "do we really
> need to go out and look for more process work".
>
>> 2) If you have comments and suggestions about the policy itself,
>> send them to this list.
>
> What I'm missing is what happens with the information described under
> "Registering to attend a meeting or social event:", there are no
> retention periods mentioned (that I noticed).

the trust's records retention policy already deals with registration.
  _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email