Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here)
Karl Auerbach <karl@cavebear.com> Wed, 22 September 2004 16:44 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22652; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:44:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAALC-0002bH-2n; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:51:38 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAAAD-00027r-99; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:40:17 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAA8D-0001RW-FO for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:38:13 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22246 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:38:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from p2.cavebear.com ([199.184.128.35]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAAEp-0002Sh-1I for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:45:03 -0400
Received: from npax.cavebear.com (npax.cavebear.com [192.203.17.71]) by p2.cavebear.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i8MGbcK0011123 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:37:38 -0700
Received: from npax.cavebear.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by npax.cavebear.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8MGbc8D001724 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:37:38 -0700
Received: (from karl@localhost) by npax.cavebear.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8MGbco6001722 for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:37:38 -0700
Received: by npax.cavebear.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 2000); Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:37:36 -0700
To: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <530800000.1095864601@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0409220901030.29741@npax.cavebear.com>
References: <20040922003307.783E1A569C@newdev.harvard.edu> <5456C2B46376189808291E40@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <530800000.1095864601@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew)
From: Karl Auerbach <karl@cavebear.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4adaf050708fb13be3316a9eee889caa
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, scott bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Karl Auerbach <karl@cavebear.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b431ad66d60be2d47c7bfeb879db82c
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: > I think this and a number of other points made here gloss over a key point of > which some of the participants may not be aware. > > Under US law, there is a significant difference between "not-for-profit" and > "charitable nonprofit".... It might be useful to add more precision. In the US there are two levels from which laws affecting corporations arise, state and Federal. Corporate structures are usually created under state law. Many states of the US have laws that allow "non-profit" or even "charitable nonprofit". Here in California, for example, there are several forms of non-profit: public-benefit, charitable, mutual benefit, religious, medical, etc. And here in the US we have a lot of states - 50 of 'em - each with its own different corporations laws. At the federal level there is yet another mountain of law, but we often end up talking about tax exemptions under Title 26 Section 501 of the US code. That part of the tax code covers a lot of territory and is very complicated and full of subtle distinctions that trigger significant differences in treatment as well as imposing rather different kinds of limitations and obligations upon the entity that is seeking or obtained one or another of these exemptions. So, when talking about these things we can avoid a lot of confusion if we try to be precise about specific state level conceptions of corporations and non-profitness and federal level conceptions of federal tax exemption and the benefits, limitations, and obligations that come from each. I might add that one of the questions that ought to be raised, and it is a question that I'm certainly neither qualified to answer nor will I even attempt to answer, is whether the IETF ought to seek Federal tax exempt status at all. Sometimes it may be better to simply file the papers, pay the tax money, and be free of many of the restrictions. --karl-- _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Leslie Daigle
- Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on wher… Leslie Daigle
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here John C Klensin
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Scott W Brim
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Ted Hardie
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Erik Huizer
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here scott bradner
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here scott bradner
- Scenario O (was: Re: Upcoming: further thoughts o… John C Klensin
- Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: further t… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Tax excemption (Re: Scenario O (was: Re: Upcoming… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… John C Klensin
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Karl Auerbach
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Sam Hartman
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Gene Gaines
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Karl Auerbach
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Gene Gaines
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Tony Hain
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Margaret Wasserman
- Re: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on where from here Kai Henningsen
- Scenario C (was: Scenario O) Kai Henningsen
- RE: Scenario O Re: Upcoming: further thoughts on … Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Kai Henningsen
- Re: Scenario C prerequisites (Re: Upcoming: furth… Gene Gaines