Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 29 December 2014 08:37 UTC
Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453071A0047 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:37:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.856
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.856 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SnOZJgfUfTJh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:37:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A801A0149 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:35:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C0A36006D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:35:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=cB8e1ROG6co2QbtkdnO/ d4VX774=; b=n7FdzvNIRhvltk9efpQq7gU6FS5SrM2HYIcFgisUjfco8pUMzmss LjXxEaekTg2TK0r0e2m2Yj9OGcFWstbbBAJXWZu80+PhBFcWLjUGqhSgRKCgEw2H pRZ/P9+IzCnbAIvdip+L2oB3hgJJ7yO6qwJGfEGQNfPCbXD4tv8jAxM=
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (mail-wg0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a86.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FD2F36006B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:35:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n12so18228791wgh.8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:35:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.74.108 with SMTP id s12mr95352351wiv.28.1419842136040; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.217.7.206 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 00:35:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20141229001241.GD24442@localhost>
References: <5614C286-0CD2-4DAD-A846-510EE38D1B9A@ietf.org> <549DAE1C.5080400@gmail.com> <54A02C8A.3020707@qti.qualcomm.com> <54A04CDC.8020009@dcrocker.net> <54A05568.705@gmail.com> <20141228201401.GB24442@localhost> <54A07420.2030507@dcrocker.net> <20141229001241.GD24442@localhost>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 02:35:35 -0600
Message-ID: <CAK3OfOhYNdQa_7ovfrZUgv+YwxN0VriYP8x9ztDd7ZM6vce=ig@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps]
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043c81e627eace050b56c274"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/y3JTAfolhfC5DxU-peEE5LVij1c
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:37:34 -0000
It occurs to me that my proposal is rather selfish, actually: motivated by difficulty for a relative outsider (I don't follow very many WGs) in understanding the actual proposal. I'd have read a fair bit of datatracker records and mailing list archive content to begin to understand some reassignment proposals, and/or talk to a number of people. The flip side is that infrequent mass reassignments must seem like a lot less work to the IESG. Each lone reassignment would have to be guaranteed to be real cheap, or the concept won't fly. But we are also not fond of light-weight processes here. Given this, I think I will now butt-out, even if the IESG and IETF end up adopting something like my suggestion.
- Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisation s… Brian E Carpenter
- Mashing areas [Re: IETF areas re-organisation ste… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisati… Stephen Farrell
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Nico Williams
- Re: Mashing areas [Re: IETF areas re-organisation… Ted Lemon
- Re: Mashing areas [Re: IETF areas re-organisation… John Leslie
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Nico Williams
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Nico Williams
- Re: Mashing areas [Re: IETF areas re-organisation… John C Klensin
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Jari Arkko
- Re: Mashing areas [Re: IETF areas re-organisation… Ted Lemon
- Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisati… Pete Resnick
- Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisati… Dave Crocker
- Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisati… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisati… Pete Resnick
- Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisati… Nico Williams
- General view of re-org proposal (was : Out-of-are… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisati… Dave Crocker
- Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisati… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisati… Nico Williams
- Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisati… Nico Williams
- Re: Out-of-area ADs [Re: IETF areas re-organisati… Nico Williams
- term for 3rd RTG AD Michael Richardson
- Re: term for 3rd RTG AD Brian E Carpenter
- RE: term for 3rd RTG AD Adrian Farrel
- Re: term for 3rd RTG AD Yoav Nir
- Re: term for 3rd RTG AD Michael Richardson
- Re: term for 3rd RTG AD John Leslie
- Re: term for 3rd RTG AD Brian E Carpenter
- Re: term for 3rd RTG AD Murray S. Kucherawy
- RE: term for 3rd RTG AD Adrian Farrel
- RE: term for 3rd RTG AD Michael StJohns
- Re: term for 3rd RTG AD Allison Mankin
- Re: term for 3rd RTG AD joel jaeggli
- Re: term for 3rd RTG AD Michael Richardson
- Re: term for 3rd RTG AD Michael StJohns
- Re: term for 3rd RTG AD Michael Richardson
- IETF areas re-organisation steps IETF Chair
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Ted Hardie
- Re: General view of re-org proposal (was : Out-of… Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Jari Arkko
- Re: General view of re-org proposal (was : Out-of… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps Donald Eastlake