IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Sun, 17 July 2016 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E9512B010 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 08:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8OwOuy7h__SY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 08:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84DC312B007 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 08:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1]) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1bOoMd-000OQK-4O; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:52:19 -0400
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:52:18 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
Message-ID: <50CEFCB2C371A569D5864608@JCK-EEE10>
In-Reply-To: <e399d18d-974b-2547-d9fd-e06429f3a12c@gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1607171150370.2309@uplift.swm.pp.se> <e399d18d-974b-2547-d9fd-e06429f3a12c@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/y4XsRx3UN-jXYAjjCtaPrBIsK8E>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:52:25 -0000


--On Monday, 18 July, 2016 01:01 +1200 Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

>...
> I've always assumed that "video" includes still photographs.

Yeah, me too.  But, some years ago, I snapped pictures during a
WG "who is volunteering to review this document" discussion to
record who, and what percentage of the room, had volunteered and
it set off a flap about pictures of people and personally
identifiable info.  I don't remember whether I/we intended to
put the pictures in the minutes or not, nor what the final
conclusion was; I personally concluded that the discussion
distracted from getting work done and wasn't worth the trouble
and I was not going to do it again.

   john

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status