Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU> Mon, 07 July 2008 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41543A6911; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039663A68FA for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hu+wGCe41PHl for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A5C3A68D5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zod.isi.edu (zod.isi.edu [128.9.168.221]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m67KcSRI008384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from faber@localhost) by zod.isi.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m67KcSiw011175; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:38:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from faber)
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:38:28 -0700
From: Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU>
To: moore@network-heretics.com
Subject: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Message-ID: <20080707203828.GC2300@zod.isi.edu>
References: <20080707133210.AWH55905@m1.imap-partners.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20080707133210.AWH55905@m1.imap-partners.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-url: http://www.isi.edu/~faber
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: faber@zod.isi.edu
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0859376412=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, moore@network-heretics.com wrote:
> If you can cite verifiable evidence that even a single case that works
> reliably now, will cease to work, I'll concede that there is at least
> a hint of merit to your argument.   e.g. an actual email address or
> URL that uses a single-label domain name.

zod:~$ ping hk
PING hk (203.119.2.28): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=183.582 ms
64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=1 ttl=243 time=195.586 ms
64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=2 ttl=243 time=196.055 ms
64 bytes from 203.119.2.28: icmp_seq=3 ttl=243 time=183.091 ms
^C
--- hk ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 20.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 183.091/189.578/196.055/6.247 ms
zod:~$ whost 203.119.2.28
203.119.2.28 www.hkdnr.hk 
zod:~$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
search isi.edu
nameserver 128.9.160.161
nameserver 128.9.64.64



-- 
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf