Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

"Dan Harkins" <> Fri, 27 May 2016 04:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE0E12D80F; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hwcXIWaVRkpH; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC5C12D54F; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B937910224008; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (SquirrelMail authenticated user by with HTTP; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 21:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
From: "Dan Harkins" <>
To: "Fernando Gont" <>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.14 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>, Margaret Cullen <>, Fred Baker <>, "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 04:11:53 -0000

On Thu, May 26, 2016 5:11 pm, Fernando Gont wrote:
> On 05/26/2016 02:44 PM, Margaret Cullen wrote:
>> Also, while I enjoy our World Tour as much as the next girl, the
>> meeting in Buenos Aires had very poor attendance from regular
>> attendees, and this made it harder to get work done, IMO.
> So this sounds like there's some form of diversity that is desirable,
> and others that aren't (e.g., geographic diversity)? e.g., why don't you
> see this "world tour" (which for a BA-resident wasn't actually a tour in
> the first place) as something that goes in favor of diversity? Or is it
> just that only some forms/expressions of diversity are desirable?

  Amen and a +1. Among the social justice crowd there seems to
be a selective definition of "diversity". A good mix of people
that might be underrepresented by "regular attendees" can still
be "diverse". And I would claim that BA qualified.

  I would also like to suggest that the ability of certain members
to bring their family on a vacation that coincides with an IETF
should not be a governing factor in venue selection. Many people
like to launder a business trip into a family vacation (myself
included!) but that's not why the IETF exists and it should have
no bearing on where we meet.