Re: What ASN.1 got right

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Wed, 03 March 2021 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C951C3A14B1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:00:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XthftIqxcY-g for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:00:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com (mail-lj1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11F723A14AB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:00:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id r25so25318077ljk.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 16:00:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KvvcdI3bO9uxuVV+Hpci61OFAruQmepMICAb1xdOq6A=; b=mmueJ4XbLwGnVYXEZxmvwYZeHKSOlyjHACfVKzLUGWlLpVf32txn1Q+KCmM4hW1ND4 FCv5+NHB7yqehVXXSJDoZ2awilFN6FuFzGTY9EuS2KzzbnQEG148lYNrhGcD7FcDipqK eeRqsdPs7MHttHn+mrThm88wj0jB/QkiGapMBu3yGKq4xD/L8273jSLrKX9kYvloNx1u 41WjFKdE1Mc0PTh4ENKN9TC9aSbzixjhOX9n9g5uIbJas+IakD3FVhUGUIw7CiQrQSzG a9zVLrnQyb2chYMhSjQfG3VRZUKqwYxE7w8z5pHNkp/N1z23INM5OlBCvKDmThca8bGn oSkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KvvcdI3bO9uxuVV+Hpci61OFAruQmepMICAb1xdOq6A=; b=qEyLTX1AGTDV1hk9cAXcZDneRV4pnTBhkWIEkKqWb9fTpvCr3a7VKsQrEQz4lIHODk Crq/qdugFJxMJrfZkkqir5j51duePglHq8q8wZql4MampruqArvqi2vdxs3CvhHe5hcH K3StWnLsWuXQ6qZKRxYyXOtybAprT5DH9IIF1tV3vN+KFnGaxjcAicvZUZ+OcoKFlALM gL5BbjHsrHId/jV1coG5SwQw3ohydb0O0gzCsx2GbIN9OyM9u3U6lo/iVMKqskKvXjhU yeE7q0uETaAG21HF6oHGCWnirlwbejUmcwbiwYM4EGeAebq9oIeLkhweX/Jpi29A6PPd SThw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SDwfZvOg6MTUjvIRRuBKMm0WmS5RPnYv6G6KdpTQWoe1dOtpG +ea5TIvUL+8rJbwvZ4M1QBLWy9c7uyGH1isQ2Sf0sw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9iEAmcWvfRnPCqU5TSgmfAWyFYCEB3rvc/JfcBpRtoqsY1wo0vthKp7EA1LH6QHePwxRKavPpLgS+DttLE2U=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:86d0:: with SMTP id n16mr13887897ljj.288.1614729646453; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 16:00:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0632b948-9ed1-f2bd-96da-9922ebb2aa60@mtcc.com> <006750D4-B70D-44F8-A01A-BD3AB136D9D3@webweaving.org> <a584ff73-34ae-1c9e-e746-ce98749461d7@mtcc.com> <20210302183901.GV30153@localhost> <CAMm+Lwj8QwuqaA3f625Ui8arc0TxY3uLXbG-PKToWGdtq8az6w@mail.gmail.com> <613072c6-5518-91e3-41b9-3b7590ee2346@mtcc.com> <CAMm+LwiEqL3bMg09e5NBNZwkPJ90DmQgLTy=SQNEN0q=vp=wrQ@mail.gmail.com> <ed6830b3-e650-d3fa-b253-9f53e01f9615@mtcc.com> <CAMm+LwifpPg-Sg9cXLpWvjmExt8KfuYq6oRZd4D1L0ZBR3nRFg@mail.gmail.com> <1631e20d-9d8a-b8c2-9d5e-6c7f4defa72d@mtcc.com> <20210302234928.GX30153@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20210302234928.GX30153@localhost>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:00:35 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn13eKWvS0meCs9MM-kCRsCD35CtH6_bsP5WeNbEnR7ing@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What ASN.1 got right
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yHYTyMShhdecX7A_ItNQ0F50X6A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 00:00:54 -0000

I "worked" (some might dispute it was work, or even helped) on X.500
in UCL-CS under Steve Kille, and at CSIRO, in this time. (on Quipu)
and at UQ in a national X500 project we ran in AARNet.

The X.500 nameforms are complex because human names are complex. I
have friends with one name, who are forced to enter their names twice,
to pass input field validity checks, and who have problems at borders
with their passport and data matching.

Some people change names as a function of gender re-assignment (when
the titular element of the name is baked into the name) or because of
ritual or because of status changes. Names are not static

Name order is cultural. Japan, with the change of Emperor, semi-hemi
formally changed the expected display order of Surname and given name.
Some Japanese like it and some don't. Chinese and Korean and
Vietnamese might share this, or not, "it depends"

I think there is a version of "7 bit ascii was good enough for me" in
names. People love to simplify from their own cultural norms. This
rarely scales.

I worked on this, in an economy (Australia) with 40% of the population
of migrant extraction or actually migrants themselves. I can tell you,
Names are not simple.

X.500 is complicated because names are complicated.

-G