Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action)
John Levine <johnl@ietf.email> Fri, 08 May 2026 17:34 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DDAEB583A1 for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2026 10:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1778261694; bh=B+NSJsbWoD8jWdZ8r9CusADd9hadbUbt5mXYzyDp0s0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=n7aWrZ9XA+3pUS3kqT8ZcS7T308uBjDkLeNGa/IqzElZeWEU1rHySWoIHYQUC7WSo PlS/83a8nDWcvKYhmwvm6FeAqerQYHorQ9+B8TVfMga6gFRYboZEvWKtRIjq00otE7 ZiXspyV9g6dktaWRsW8ZNr2iXHMmehXUYYsA/PQs=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="oApeyYDx"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ietf.email header.b="tEdg9w0g"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SV2vGbRWtD3s for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2026 10:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79D16EB58392 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2026 10:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 35272 invoked from network); 8 May 2026 17:34:50 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=89c669fe1eba.k2605; t=1778261680; x=1778607280; bh=B+NSJsbWoD8jWdZ8r9CusADd9hadbUbt5mXYzyDp0s0=; b=oApeyYDxbj9hkCbfSd9wR79Hugjwor3jM7o1a7o3sFxRKZpgR4Rk2Xtb8Nq3A7/TueryIffZBnn/etii+qcjOexiLfis1nEWrkU7uHuouLna53toZ8eWlJWgouzASY/XKjV9VNUX/etEAsZmSUkbvkpO8cpgVHkp6Y47BaLCfXx/SeVMNZGRtIH9RgX0eZFzY+M3VP2lIq5F7Nx2yp1iNcs8Fy1Ypwxfoh2wn5KMYZBcIWh60aO7oaj137r7obCR8EdWXWyMyvBfs906EQFdPWBqsKGla4TJsjEhN/QltEZBEoWqdlew9Gu7bvcCwuZXzk7K7+TtzP/h/KBvSaHN8A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=ietf.email; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=89c669fe1eba.k2605; bh=B+NSJsbWoD8jWdZ8r9CusADd9hadbUbt5mXYzyDp0s0=; b=tEdg9w0gfU/TK1GzAtRvtx7EgBS4SKhwiwx5OIgTUZS80POn2cTPyFikmByraKd0AP9KnVazSi+H9v/xg7dFO9fDGXrmmFX/YoUZLJqX9nyZRYV53hZFu9G+jmnyd6aUAktyXuo5PY6u2FOj42rylkH6LHGZhRkdbETRT1eO8T7ux3LYyMzKJLhlKwKvNNnVPHcN9Bpbpx2JGKYrDcH51mi+b7tlrJ6s6lgFhHuQuXRplzBikG3xBxRbMJFToIJSi3tqcCu3UXrWQ4jXBGY66/yyNoRuaDYotPPf/f5BZKyt4npMVqW0nM+KLi7oNRTTUViNgo6srwlcGayrbmYhTw==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 08 May 2026 17:34:50 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id A6DB5108BFDA6; Fri, 8 May 2026 13:34:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 13:34:49 -0400
Message-Id: <20260508173449.A6DB5108BFDA6@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@ietf.email>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action)
In-Reply-To: <LV8PR11MB85369B6512CDCA4BA26D8692B53D2@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <CAChr6SynwXB6nsU8dpjmFDbFxDaHL6TgevAsRYXJtS7cbCURxQ@mail.gmail.com> <67864CE5-6504-453E-B6F6-3B9C5C1C155D@sobco.com> <LV8PR11MB85369B6512CDCA4BA26D8692B53D2@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: Z3DPV4FDJUFRJKVSUWXL7NMIVFDTRV5W
X-Message-ID-Hash: Z3DPV4FDJUFRJKVSUWXL7NMIVFDTRV5W
X-MailFrom: johnl@iecc.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: rwilton@cisco.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yK77_P7qZPDcJeiUUfDfBuyg2bo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
It appears that Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >I think that I'm with the John Levine solution for this one. Just stick the draft/idea on github and don't publish it to IETF as an ID. I.e., I think that this is a workable >solution for what is a very rare exception. By coincidence, we have a real life example on the DISPATCH list today. Let's see how it works. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/icgwD841UwXIdF1bMmiQeqZQiMY/ R's, John
- List moderator action Chris Box
- Re: List moderator action Chris Box
- Re: List moderator action Eric Heflin
- Re: List moderator action Brian E Carpenter
- Re: List moderator action Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: List moderator action Stephen Farrell
- Re: List moderator action Nick Hilliard
- Re: List moderator action Christian Hopps
- Re: List moderator action S Moonesamy
- Re: List moderator action Simon Josefsson
- Re: List moderator action Bron Gondwana
- Re: List moderator action Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: List moderator action S Moonesamy
- Re: List moderator action Tom Beecher
- Re: List moderator action Lars Eggert
- Re: List moderator action Chris Box
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: Stream differences (Was: legal consultation) Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: List moderator action Rob Sayre
- Re: List moderator action Simon Josefsson
- Re: List moderator action Simon Josefsson
- Re: List moderator action Brian E Carpenter
- Re: List moderator action Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: List moderator action Rob Sayre
- Re: List moderator action Brian E Carpenter
- Re: List moderator action Simon Josefsson
- Re: List moderator action Eliot Lear
- Re: List moderator action Simon Josefsson
- Re: List moderator action Salz, Rich
- Re: List moderator action Livingood, Jason
- Re: List moderator action Rob Sayre
- Re: List moderator action Stephen Farrell
- Re: List moderator action Jay Daley
- Re: List moderator action Brian E Carpenter
- Re: List moderator action Chris Box
- Re: List moderator action Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: List moderator action S Moonesamy
- Re: List moderator action Brian E Carpenter
- Re: List moderator action Jay Daley
- Re: List moderator action Rob Sayre
- Re: List moderator action Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Livingood, Jason
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Joel Halpern
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Simon Josefsson
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John Levine
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Simon Josefsson
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Lars Eggert
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Scudder, John
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… John Levine
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… Salz, Rich
- Stream differences (Was: legal consultation) Jay Daley
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Salz, Rich
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Scott Bradner
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John C Klensin
- Re: Stream differences (Was: legal consultation) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John C Klensin
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Scott O. Bradner
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… John C Klensin
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Scott Bradner
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… John C Klensin
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Scott Bradner
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Joel Halpern
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John Levine
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: no no derivatives, was legal consultation (wa… S Moonesamy
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John Levine
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) John R Levine
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) George Michaelson
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: legal consultation (was List moderator action) Rob Sayre