IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Review of: Characterization of Proposed Standards

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 02 November 2013 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA0B21F9EFE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 15:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.958
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.958 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A8l0TtS58n3Q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 15:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDAD11E825A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 15:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w4so3216463qcr.26 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3CfXS8SMTqJeUuOVyPORNSPhdy16Y06kyGhKWGIC76w=; b=QvDGijPA26gDAQILCbuYbvfdDrlDVnZGvKZvNaCdML1+8MPp3U3ozHY5giHR9uDdts icGwv8EqQMKPLF7m61A+Fy1uCSEhcngUYsmxwpCHBYc/iLmdZmDP3KRDSTWoJ2HFMoyd fyJEFrTQi2qktXWBoRMVThMiBuaTZKkj8yyqx0o4G6wdXSuZU1MhiAiU3bDkfutyfXJp PxvwRGOyymzBo4qjGd3TL1Skkq3TD7ba0Jvhi0l045O/EjXwXJ+V9j+q9TyH42Wfkw21 OXHuFmMhMhauaQElS4PBt+DUruDETzGxd1OlhxdNO3kXVdAFNxLuzYmvtTwTyWW6WV/2 xoDw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.24.74 with SMTP id s10mr13009452qef.24.1383431295101; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.67.130 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 15:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <52757BC3.9020100@dcrocker.net>
References: <5269209F.3060706@dcrocker.net> <B4B31C25-C472-41B3-AAF8-96670E0E243F@NLnetLabs.nl> <52729C1D.7010400@dcrocker.net> <CAC4RtVCewEKatJKJnBbCqgsuBjHCOHY49WoTx+y-K_zDt+Smxg@mail.gmail.com> <40AFC5D09A1926489ECFED9D7633D98A20045B@ESESSMB307.ericsson.se> <CALaySJJ_o=YTgmzsUmJRWfNwH1-5DnhyKF_xDXa8nKQ=5_-jRQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJKC+hP5SRn5-Euh7ugjRB-iQU5Wd090PKh-W+F8Y7adxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJJkbjCd9M=b_gZEGk9Y3nA1KH3hFoi45Sr1Z5=UFg5HgA@mail.gmail.com> <52757BC3.9020100@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:28:15 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: --9kEpidqWSJeBQb_Lm1RvTV9Eg
Message-ID: <CALaySJKJUVJP3Z-TtS2Yc+9-14L1LX7c5=ZnP4wUf27fvhVnXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Review of: Characterization of Proposed Standards
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "<draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified.all@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-kolkman-proposed-standards-clarified.all@tools.ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 22:28:16 -0000

>> Oh, and, of course, if we use my suggestion below, this document will
>> have to "update" 6410 as well as 2026.
>
> It will "obsolete" both 6410 and 2026.  It's replacing them.

No, I don't think so.  It's replacing specific sections of them, but
not the whole documents.  I think we'd have a very hard time getting
consensus on a full replacement of 2026.

Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email