IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your comments on ...

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Mon, 26 January 2009 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC0928C24B; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:11:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4EE228C24B for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:11:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fi7VFtML8hE6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:11:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EA228C21C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:11:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id B0ECC451D; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:10:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your comments on ...
References: <20090124154913.53426.qmail@simone.iecc.com> <B5720E65D2354F659809CA433C4D0C59@DGBP7M81> <p06240814c5a109bd52c0@[165.227.249.206]> <20090126134111.GB26705@shinkuro.com> <497DD87D.9010609@dcrocker.net> <20090126160126.GD9210@mit.edu> <041FB8732DA02FEFFEE5D98B@[192.168.1.118]> <1F47626F-BE7B-46AC-9B1B-7DBC600AE357@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:10:56 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1F47626F-BE7B-46AC-9B1B-7DBC600AE357@mit.edu> (Ken Raeburn's message of "Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:37:09 -0500")
Message-ID: <tsl1vuqgcpb.fsf@live.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> "Ken" == Ken Raeburn <raeburn@MIT.EDU> writes:

    Ken> That might be an argument for restricting posting to
    Ken> subscribers only.  At least some mailing list management
    Ken> software will let you put yourself on a list but flagged as
    Ken> not to receive mail, if you already read it through some
    Ken> other means (local bulletin board, web archives, etc).
    Ken> Getting onto the list could be the way one indicates that one
    Ken> has read the Note Well text, which was sent along with the
    Ken> link to click to confirm blah blah blah.

I think having an opt-in list of people who have agreed to IETF IPR
policy would be better.  As a document reviewer or anyone doing
cross-area work, having to subscribe to a WG list to send mail there
is quite unacceptable.  Something like thew3c.org contribution policy
stuff would be far more acceptable.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status