IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring)

Susan Harris <srh@merit.edu> Thu, 02 September 2004 13:46 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA03450; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:46:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2rxm-00055M-AD; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:49:21 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2rn4-0007yN-7f; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:38:14 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2rjG-000680-6u for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:34:18 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA02725 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:34:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from backin5.merit.edu ([198.108.60.28]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2rle-00047r-5u for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:36:47 -0400
Received: by backin5.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8935) id 114757E50C; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:34:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by backin5.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3B429ADA; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:34:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:34:12 -0400
From: Susan Harris <srh@merit.edu>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4136FFFB.4000300@zurich.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0409020933260.5266@backin5.merit.edu>
References: <OLEPILDGDKGAPONGCBEOCEKOCHAA.cdel@firsthand.net> <4136FFFB.4000300@zurich.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: What to incorporate (Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126

> >>If people want that possibility described, please speak up - Carl has the
> >>pen ready....
> >>
> >
> >
> > Yes that would be helpful.
>
> Well, I don't agree. I think it would defocus the discussion (which
> is about putting the IETF's administration onto a business-like
> basis). IMHO the only case in which we should discuss the wider
> option is if the newtrk WG proposes changes in the standards process
> that would make such a thing necessary.

What he said.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email