Re: [123attendees] Re: [122attendees] Toward Inclusive Participation– Community Dialogue on Venue Selection (draft-attoumani-ietf-inclusion)
Michael De Roover <ietf@nixmagic.com> Tue, 10 June 2025 19:50 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@nixmagic.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165F63356505; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wzytLINa3AqU; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nixmagic.com (e1.nixmagic.com [116.203.235.171]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DD43356500; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from workstation.vm.ideapad.lan (dhcp13.lan [192.168.10.213]) by nixmagic.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 661C21176BB; Tue, 10 Jun 2025 19:50:07 +0000 (UTC)
From: Michael De Roover <ietf@nixmagic.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [123attendees] Re: [122attendees] Toward Inclusive Participation– Community Dialogue on Venue Selection (draft-attoumani-ietf-inclusion)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 21:50:07 +0200
Message-ID: <3149153.4k9bo66Ifk@workstation.vm.ideapad.lan>
Organization: workstation.vm.ideapad.lan
In-Reply-To: <CAGgd1Oe-qYH8H+PFc1TqpD0HMO7FztSVy8mfk7G=S7qJHEYycA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKFB6LXnGqKWDSSreGkV_QNoQ=ifgNK-DrQHXsWpGHYtKnWMcA@mail.gmail.com> <2913399.Be1IZIKYoX@workstation.vm.ideapad.lan> <CAGgd1Oe-qYH8H+PFc1TqpD0HMO7FztSVy8mfk7G=S7qJHEYycA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID-Hash: X3XQEPXBB5VYODRSJ7WYHPPRSWBPK5UW
X-Message-ID-Hash: X3XQEPXBB5VYODRSJ7WYHPPRSWBPK5UW
X-MailFrom: ietf@nixmagic.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: 123attendees@ietf.org, mtgvenue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yVl1Bc042-G-adrLoJllxai80Ys>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
On Tuesday, June 10, 2025 12:33:11 AM CEST Deb Cooley wrote: > If you attended remotely, there are unlimited fee waivers for remote > attendance. As Kyle says, the video teleconferencing situation is pretty > spectacular. > For in person attendance, there are a small number of fee waivers, but they > are much harder to get. > > In both cases, a fee waiver has to be applied for. > > So if you did the hackathon in Madrid and/or splurged for the workshop in > Madrid (or received one of the small number of fee waivers), you could > attend Montreal remotely on a fee waiver. > > In all of those cases, you need to figure out which working groups interest > you, read the mail list, review the drafts, etc. > > Deb Cooley Hi Deb, thank you for this reply! The fee waivers being unlimited for remote attendance is quite nice, I'd imagine that to make them much easier to get yeah. For the first time attendance (I have never attended IETF before), perhaps it wouldn't be a bad idea. That way it fits easier into scheduling too. For this time in Madrid, I unfortunately already have another flight and stay planned. But I have already stuck a pin into this for a while, and would like to take the plunge in the not too distant future. Regarding the in-person fee for the week though (seems to be 1-1.5k?), I think it's worth thinking in terms of what else that kind of money can do. It could buy a really nice smartphone, or a laptop or such. Some people might prefer this over that. But I think in this case, what I'm really after is the experience. Is the idea of pursuing a waiver or going out of pocket going to improve or diminish that experience? Lots to think about... This is a bit embarrassing to admit, but several of the people on the IETF lists, are people I have idolized before. No, I won't name them! But to be able to talk to those people, even just on the lists, it never fails to be quite surreal. To be able to have access to those people for an entire week, in person, to be able to shake hands with them... That is the kind of "backstage" that I would consider the money worth paying for. I think the most important thing I want to take away from it, is the life lessons that each of us cares about technology, how we best build it, and how we can grow within it. How even Steve Jobs (whose biography I consider somewhat sacred, and got me on this path), initially had to struggle to secure his first order of the Apple I computer. It humanizes what eventually became a 3 trillion dollar company. Building social connections, attending conferences and meetings, mutual refinement, ... I want to learn how all of this actually works. How do we build "an Internet" anyway? -- Met vriendelijke groet, Michael De Roover Mail: ietf@nixmagic.com Web: michael.de.roover.eu.org
- Re: [122attendees] Re: [123attendees] Toward Incl… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [122attendees] [123attendees] Toward Inclusiv… Laurence Lundblade
- Re: [123attendees] Re: [122attendees] Toward Incl… Kyle Rose
- Re: [123attendees] Re: [122attendees] Toward Incl… Michael De Roover
- Re: [123attendees] Re: [122attendees] Toward Incl… Deb Cooley
- Re: [123attendees] Re: [122attendees] Toward Incl… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [123attendees] Re: [122attendees] Toward Incl… Michael De Roover
- Re: [123attendees] Re: [122attendees] Toward Incl… Frantisek Borsik
- Re: [123attendees] Re: [122attendees] Toward Incl… Tobias Fiebig
- Re: [123attendees] Re: [122attendees] Toward Incl… Michael De Roover
- Re: [122attendees] Re: [123attendees] Toward Incl… Abdussalam Baryun