IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration

Christian O'Flaherty <christian.oflaherty@gmail.com> Tue, 19 April 2016 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <christian.oflaherty@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6815412E635 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C6XDBlEHK_Ss for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com (mail-vk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72A2E12E596 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id t129so32631701vkg.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=yQ7EBdKP+S4xMBAnHV9gC9RhdiihiL+PdLuVmit7HTs=; b=zCyf6uSiuZTVuGYYv1Xh8Sxaq66Eqnf5Uip+8Dnt+Whxdsec/AcHj3Uumx3UTX8je0 pNIV3UCX1KzvEBgDL3kRi1E21vwJTKtzyEEOswEyztZ+RLk2ibLdny32nrLvY5dQFHDU S/KaDBc4GsA8mM0v1RyuQiN2YgfGQphurHyDIJcPLWMIK1RFbJnsmUp/kDxG0U/9LoEt OuNOfnheWOgt4R2qhm0ld/XWjF+LPo8NkaR2XOoGmrOvJykDOuMfbomVYOX89ruQ5PPq TVH4KYOsQ6/cmXYbIqlqT6x+yM4OcdK9KFt58lYQBQYiA5xEYG4Z1Z4x7HLhr5cKPga+ +bWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=yQ7EBdKP+S4xMBAnHV9gC9RhdiihiL+PdLuVmit7HTs=; b=dpQyD5SPSnkEYxTVSNjUaQ0hkkYJLx2Fwuofa8gdf2rcEwmgPXWkrMqweThhFrMehh 2pWmliCX86JSdn8JyP5F7helbJD6UFwKCAJwiwU8f4DUV6EzbweRZQ1LtcDMCCMvu7/J 2YEhJ2jaTUPSWGMTGtLoMu8T8oUDD3WHODNDNdbWFOxwQmZ1WdwylflB4SesR5ImkhMN HjQX7K1rZLWSNn84H5ENyyyt3pI3Q5Hl+iI+I9EWUtzf6hZcKQHYbZbiw37KLipEVDig NBgUKZk8j4h5YPr4NCIOA1joh0/+MlgV8gNtnUXeGR8YBCj6NxXDU4mVWc3h3lyKwgsL gHFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FU962OkS5FLIbaDjFR/At4dn4DjCgFTuABFdTXICmms4hDeTsMPVA5nort0QQrh+Q==
X-Received: by 10.176.1.5 with SMTP id 5mr2602613uak.72.1461094537556; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.13] (r167-61-127-90.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy. [167.61.127.90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 37sm11215460ual.21.2016.04.19.12.35.28 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9E4F89C6-07A7-467C-BB13-66FDE59055A0"
From: Christian O'Flaherty <christian.oflaherty@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1n+676sAWFLee3oUGUgnTNHh95yFgrsmyjB5VbSmF-=XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:35:15 -0300
Message-Id: <9BC149F0-83E7-44A8-AE04-89C3FDC15693@gmail.com>
References: <20160418161552.9368.65562.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8fb376e11631f9ddf73f9385ec5472c3.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <57151C55.30206@gmail.com> <54D9A539-6409-4692-85F6-E4837E823AAE@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1n+676sAWFLee3oUGUgnTNHh95yFgrsmyjB5VbSmF-=XQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/y_pZHjIiIc9Z908uTQIyqO5cdKE>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:35:42 -0000

> On Apr 19, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
> 
> It should be pretty easy for the IAD to measure this by comparing the list of newcomers in Argentina to the list of participants in Berlin, for example.  

But I was interested in addressing this part:

>  I'm very hopeful that some of the
> > South Americans who attended their first IETF meeting because
> > it was held in Buenos Aires will continue to participate (as in:
> > bring in work and participate in ongoing work, and not as in: sit
> > in meetings)


that would be, for example, WG mailing list contributions from Latin America (or at least subscriptions since IETF95) .

it’s very difficult to measure… but I’m open to suggestions. 

Christian


> I am fairly sure that they already do this, and possibly may even have made presentations about it from time to time at the plenary... :)
> 
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Christian O'Flaherty <christian.oflaherty@gmail.com <mailto:christian.oflaherty@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> > On Apr 18, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com <mailto:melinda.shore@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 4/18/16 9:09 AM, Dan Harkins wrote:
> >> But
> >> I think these issues should be balanced with the overall benefit
> >> that the IETF World Tour provides.
> >
> > As I've said repeatedly, I don't think the world tour actually
> > does bring much benefit.  I'm very hopeful that some of the
> > South Americans who attended their first IETF meeting because
> > it was held in Buenos Aires will continue to participate (as in:
> > bring in work and participate in ongoing work, and not as in: sit
> > in meetings) but historically that has not been the case.
> 
> 
> BTW… if there’s a way to keep track and measure that additional active participation from Latin America I’ll be happy to do it.
> 
> I’m open to suggestions on how it can be than.
> 
> Christian
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > I also
> > think that the world tour tends to have the unintended side-effect
> > of overemphasizing the importance of meetings to our process.
> >
> > Also, note that a large number of regulars opted to skip the meeting
> > in Buenos Aires.  Granted, there are those who might see that as
> > a benefit.
> >
> > Melinda
> >
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email