Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]
Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 13 April 2016 02:42 UTC
Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE20A12DD98 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AB1xR1tQRWDP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6842112DD7D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id w85so46973964oiw.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=McFJyBRP9tbvnvkC5EsFcABlvGkcY1UV1mf4ahKxAOw=; b=NsSLclQT3tUz0ekk6uuHt8xmwkR9Q5DjN0De+GMXREgG1NrtfTpaF6vupcyA3V4uPE OSRJLPJohA8ieFh9ywtNkFnt5qqjyB5kOj7oY1wSQ0Id/NIFJb3xH4L1Yed/lYBV0nR+ s1PtA0Qbaw+b5B4pz4h+0GSVM1w0y5H/QQj5pYXVZ7fEYkanRUBmKKC5pToMwbzQv6y0 GPLryBsSwihznXyUZKOiG0XTgB2W6eYtntV/cdhIi6madJcM5SW+wGDr7FXs5+U0gH/6 S3SLdXa5FwahzbR0UxMh9TrYghkiZF6vkT9XmkVQTTn406o5iw2xAe3BWTc1NZM2Nmwf 7yvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=McFJyBRP9tbvnvkC5EsFcABlvGkcY1UV1mf4ahKxAOw=; b=QscF8fH0b4zxr1Q7Wq0g3fizdv0i0clpQTFp7e9+CQFc8ZrlS7PirAeSYCWzC+Oj6c V4g9gR3N2zXjbmreRBO7W+9a/1k07LUQ2f82vqzb5/fLW2dBE/VYFdam1n4puU4uqup4 nuLMGHu/x+hIrqAItcy7S7ZyG/kH0kA0YICftEoKa8jjmUp5rhz4zN3sNwxyMJINV8Z3 +NJfJKY+u2DYDmV4lrPZkLoIAYrcdqBWXPSSW4UpldLtnVtBYu9+RYgxZ/E9tELoEyPa t773S/6SCD52j1YXFo2+7o086400CG9nMACjyAdhn7JcifYSWkiHHAf04OGbZjBEg5/v fMGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW6wEXcib3HqOGVTlS7+7HfCkwCUwkrR9iNR1kSR23nWL0vHHTs5X6Z9wBUq+GB/6WUTXj8aKlwWkKaIw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.172.201 with SMTP id v192mr2836870oie.29.1460515348731; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.115.168 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <570DAA2F.1040007@gmail.com>
References: <570AB3AF.2050401@gmail.com> <87twj99c6w.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <CAKe6YvMyp-DyeDwpPY6KYmbDbnpgnvVk_cUStnA32wmgDWcz3w@mail.gmail.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233A62AA18@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <20160411104519.GA19092@gsp.org> <3F48466D-390C-4C18-B958-732AE3E46FF1@gmail.com> <20160411223403.GA6743@gsp.org> <87twj7eon7.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <20160412110839.GA20488@gsp.org> <8760vn82f2.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <20160412124639.GA27223@gsp.org> <570DAA2F.1040007@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:42:28 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rdtyfZWiUD7yGAF8YoTiuN1TaE+Zqe+q0hpXZHdtUZ1oA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapore]
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ced748cdf95053054ba7e"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yfdd5QVV4jA43d5B49fQjj7tgnA>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:42:33 -0000
What I would love to see is some brainstorming on how to recreate the serendipity of IETF hallway interactions. For instance, could we have people sign up for "random 15-minute conversations" while indicating a general area (or set of WGs) of interest? Think sort of like "speed-mentoring" but for all? It could include video to get closer to in-person and maybe start with some suggested ice-breakers (favorite IETF meeting site, preferred beverage, best snack, first IETF meeting....)? I can't beat the benefits of randomly seeing someone who didn't come immediately to mind - and knowing precisely who to go talk to (ok - I'm an AD - encourage into volunteering to do something). Until we can recreate some of that randomness and recognition that we are all people who care about technology and the Internet (and have families, opinions on books, etc), I can't see that decreasing physical IETF meetings would be at all productive. Regards, Alia On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > Cherry-picking a few points: > On 13/04/2016 00:46, Rich Kulawiec wrote: > ... > > And the difficulties/expense of travel are only going to get worse > > for the forseeable future: they're not going to get better. > > That is indisputable. > > On 13/04/2016 00:49, Loa Andersson wrote: > > > Let us say that we set aside enough time about half way between two IETF > > meetings and schedule all the meetings, as requested by wg chairs or > > people in charge of other meetings, as a long series. > > That won't work with 4-monthly meetings as today. It might work with > 6-monthly meetings. > > > Let us assume that the wg meetings is on average 1.5 hours, scheduling > > 100 wg meetings would require 150 hours. > > I think that's optimistic. Remote meetings go more slowly due to technology > glitches and the need for more formal patterns of Q/A. It's still faster > than > email though (see Alia's message). > > On 13/04/2016 03:42, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > > > I believe that there would be a real cost in moving to remote-only > meetings. > > Even putting aside the time zone difficulties, and the reduced > effectiveness > > of in-meeting interaction, there are aspects of face-to-face interaction > > taht current remote technologies simply do not capture. > > Yes. I've been on a one-meeting-per-year model once or twice for personal > reasons and it is *inferior* to attending every meeting. Some people > can manage to time shift their lives for a week for remote participation, > but most people can't; family, day job, and sunshine combine against it. > The time zone issue is exclusionary. Also, there is nothing like the > intensity of being on site with everybody. > > Not to say that we shouldn't improve even more on what we can do > with Meetecho. But an important part of being able to make the best > use of remote participation is *knowing* the people at the other > end from previous in-person meetings. > > > It was very helpful in BA (and at many previous IETF meetings) to be able > > to find time to talk with a small number of people concerned about an > > aspect of one working group. I did that over meals, breaks, etc. It > > sorted out issues far more effectively than email conversations (in > several > > cases, we had tried to sort it out via email. 10 minutes face-to-face > > clarified what was being missed, and found a good path forward.) > > On 13/04/2016 04:00, Ted Lemon wrote: > > This is all true, but the idea that it can't be replicated online is > silly. > > How did you arrange to have lunch with these people? You went looking > > for them, rounded them up, and sat down to lunch. You can do that online > > as well. > > You can, but it's a much more deliberate action and you're less > likely to get serendipity effects. I would probably have been in > some of those discussions in BA that Joel mentioned, but unfortunately > I was on the wrong side of the world and fast asleep. > > IMHO we need the right blend of in-person and virtual meetings, and > we'll find that blend by progressive change, not by revolution. > > Brian > > > > > >
- Concerns about Singapore Jari Arkko
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Adam Roach
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Dhruv Dhody
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Jeffrey Haas
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Leif Johansson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Dhruv Dhody
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Donald Eastlake
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Leif Johansson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: Concerns about Singapore David Conrad
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Melinda Shore
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Leif Johansson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Laurent Ciavaglia
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Leif Johansson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Laurent Ciavaglia
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Jared Mauch
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Yoav Nir
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Concerns about Singapore John C Klensin
- A distinction along Pete's dimensions (was: Re: C… John C Klensin
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ted Lemon
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions Dave Crocker
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions Ted Lemon
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Randy Bush
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Leif Johansson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Leif Johansson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Christian Hopps
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: Concerns about Singapore nalini.elkins
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Yoav Nir
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions Jari Arkko
- China Ole Jacobsen
- SV: Concerns about Singapore Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Paul Wouters
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Patrik Fältström
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Michael Richardson
- Re: China Jeffrey Haas
- Re: China Ted Lemon
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Stefan Winter
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Andrew Allen
- Re: China Michael Richardson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Toerless Eckert (eckert)
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Michael Richardson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Dave Crocker
- Re: A distinction along Pete's dimensions Ray Pelletier
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Andrew Allen
- Re: China Scott Bradner
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Yoav Nir
- Re: China Tim Chown
- Re: China Ray Pelletier
- Re: China Mary Barnes
- Re: SV: Concerns about Singapore Martin Rex
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Dave Crocker
- Re: China HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore David Morris
- Re: China Ole Jacobsen
- Re: China Melinda Shore
- Re: China Ole Jacobsen
- Re: China Melinda Shore
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Michael Richardson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore John G. Scudder
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ole Jacobsen
- Follow-ups: Concerns about Singapore Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Harish Pillay
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Harish Pillay
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Harish Pillay
- Re: China JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: China Ray Pelletier
- Re: China Stewart Bryant
- Re: China Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Randy Bush
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Randy Bush
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Randy Bush
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore John C Klensin
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Yoav Nir
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Andrew Allen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Yoav Nir
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Melinda Shore
- Re: Concerns about Singapore joel jaeggli
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Melinda Shore
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Michael StJohns
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Melinda Shore
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Randy Bush
- Re: Concerns about Singapore John C Klensin
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Patrik Fältström
- Re: Concerns about Singapore John C Klensin
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Warren Kumari
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Andrew Allen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Andrew Allen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Andrew Allen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Leif Johansson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore nalini.elkins
- Re: Concerns about Singapore chopps
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Randy Bush
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Michael StJohns
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Randy Bush
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Michael StJohns
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Dave Crocker
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Jared Mauch
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places John Levine
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Dave Crocker
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Michael StJohns
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Robert Withers
- Re: Concerns about Singapore chopps
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Vinayak Hegde
- Re: Concerns about Singapore John C Klensin
- RE: Concerns about Singapore Andrew Allen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Hutton, Andrew
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Stephen Farrell
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Yoav Nir
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ted Lemon
- Re: Concerns about Singapore John C Klensin
- Virtual Meetings John Leslie
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Yoav Nir
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Yoav Nir
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ted Lemon
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Stewart Bryant
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Dave Crocker
- Re: Concerns about Singapore chopps
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Richard Shockey
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Jared Mauch
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Rich Kulawiec
- 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concerns ab… Stephen Farrell
- Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Singapo… chopps
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ted Lemon
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concern… David Farmer
- Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore lloyd.wood
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concern… Ted Lemon
- Re: Concerns about Singapore George Michaelson
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concern… Stephen Farrell
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concern… Mark Andrews
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concern… Miles Fidelman
- Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore Jared Mauch
- Re: 1000 person virtual meeting (Was: Re: Concern… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ted Lemon
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Tim Chown
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Tim Chown
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ted Lemon
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… chopps
- Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore Mikael Abrahamsson
- Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singapore) Tim Chown
- Re: Meetecho was Re: Concerns about Singapore Tim Chown
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Loa Andersson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Loa Andersson
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singap… Ted Lemon
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singap… Alia Atlas
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ted Lemon
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… chopps
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singap… Tim Chown
- Re: Virtual IETFs (was: Re: Concerns about Singap… Ted Lemon
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Mary Barnes
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Christian Hopps
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Theodore V Faber
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Ted Lemon
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Ted Lemon
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places Ted Lemon
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Dhruv Dhody
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ted Lemon
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Melinda Shore
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Melinda Shore
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Theodore V Faber
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Miles Fidelman
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Theodore V Faber
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Melinda Shore
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… chopps
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… chopps
- Re: Concerns about Singapore HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Melinda Shore
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Melinda Shore
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Stewart Bryant
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Andy Bierman
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ted Lemon
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places John R Levine
- UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore and ot… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore an… Christopher Morrow
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Alia Atlas
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: UK blacklist (Re: Concerns about Singapore an… Tim Chown
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places Tony Finch
- Re: Concerns about Singapore and other places tom p.
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Yoav Nir
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Loa Andersson
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Rich Kulawiec
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Jeffrey Haas
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Ted Lemon
- Re: Concerns about Singapore Theodore V Faber
- Re: Remote only meetings? [Re: Concerns about Sin… Brian E Carpenter