Re: Alternative Proposal for Two-Stage IETF Standardization

["Spencer Dawkins" <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Ned,


>> Russ,
>
>> > Dave:
>> >
>> > This is a significant improvement from my perspective.  We need a
>> > mechanism to implement it.  The mechanism does not need to be heavy
>> > weight, and it might be as simple as some statements in a Last Call,
>> > allowing the community to support or challenge them.
>> >
>> > Russ
>
>> Thank you for the hallway conversation on this.
>
>> When I counted last week, only 80 implementation reports have been filed
>> with the IESG in the history of "ever", so this doesn't seem like the 
>> right
>> hurdle for advancement.
>
> I assume that figure was arrived at by looking at:
>
>  http://www.ietf.org/iesg/implementation-report.html
>
> If so, it's apropos of nothing, since the list is incomplete. Just as one
> example, MIME interop info isn't on it, and that information definitely 
> was
> generated.

Yes, that's correct. That's where the figure came from.

Spencer