Re: IETF Logo Wear
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 16 August 2010 22:33 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139CC3A6359; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.115
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.115 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.484, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e4Ly4xrfUJOb; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD633A6765; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-3.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEALZZaUyrRN+J/2dsb2JhbACgS3GlFZt5hTsEhC2FNQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,378,1278288000"; d="scan'208";a="234270336"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2010 22:34:15 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-220.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-220.cisco.com [10.32.244.220]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7GMY84C029098; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:34:10 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-220.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:34:15 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by stealth-10-32-244-220.cisco.com on Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:34:15 -0700
Subject: Re: IETF Logo Wear
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C69B700.3070001@ieca.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:34:02 -0700
Message-Id: <09648DE5-C1BE-4ADE-A6E7-2487E25B041C@cisco.com>
References: <20100816152653.C48183A6765@core3.amsl.com> <AANLkTik=3OJuXAVXgxTJbz7uWtpVdAu0P6i=RGh5TQep@mail.gmail.com> <5CF029D3-B740-48E8-B66B-9C6F0E1472CC@cisco.com> <4C69B700.3070001@ieca.com>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:33:41 -0000
IEN 111, August 1979. The preface reads: This document describes the Internet Protocol. There have been three previous editions of this specification, and the present text draws heavily from them. There have been many contributors to this document both in terms of concepts and in terms of text. Jon Postel Editor I suspect that, as editor, he would blanch a bit at finding anything there attributed specifically to *him*; he would have said - and on occasion did say - "I was there", but would go on to point out that there were many contributors and many contributions. That said, it is the first instance I can find of the Robustness Principle: The implementation of a protocol must be robust. Each implementation must expect to interoperate with others created by different individuals. While the goal of this specification is to be explicit about the protocol there is the possibility of differing interpretations. In general, an implementation should be conservative in its sending behavior, and liberal in its receiving behavior. That is, it should be careful to send well-formed datagrams, but should accept any datagram that it can interpret (e.g., not object to technical errors where the meaning is still clear). The comment, in various forms, is repeated in IENs 112, 123, 124, 128, and 129, and in RFCs 760, 761, 791, and 793. On Aug 16, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Sean Turner wrote: > I like: > > "Be conservative in what you send and liberal in what you accept" > Jon Postel > > I'm sure somebody who has been around longer than me can offer up a date ;) > > spt > > > Fred Baker wrote: >> There's no place like ::1 >> On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Philip Nesser wrote: >>> We obviously need an IETF branded one of these: http://www.cafepress.com/+theres_127001_infant_bodysuit,111188172 >>> >>> >>> ---> Phil >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:26 AM, IETF Administrative Director <iad@ietf.org> wrote: >>> All; >>> >>> At the request of the community the IAOC and the IETF Trust have approved >>> the establishment of an online store from which the community can buy IETF >>> logo wear. >>> >>> The store is at CafePress at: http://www.cafepress.com/ietf >>> >>> The store is maintained by the Internet Society and is expected to >>> generate a very modest income, which will be used to offset IETF >>> operational expenses. >>> >>> Suggestions for products or designs may be directed to Steve Conte, >>> conte@isoc.org. >>> >>> Shouldn't everyone in your family have an IETF logo wear t-shirt? >>> >>> Ray Pelletier >>> IAD >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ietf mailing list >>> Ietf@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Ietf mailing list >>> Ietf@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- IETF Logo Wear IETF Administrative Director
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Mans Nilsson
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Philip Nesser
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Alia Atlas
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Fred Baker
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Fred Baker
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Sean Turner
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Fred Baker
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Mark Nottingham
- RE: IETF Logo Wear Christian Huitema
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Jorge Amodio
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Dave CROCKER
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Dave CROCKER
- Re: IETF Logo Wear John Levine
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Philip Nesser
- Re: IETF Logo Wear J.D. Falk
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Fred Baker
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Patrik Fältström
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Ralph Droms
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Fred Baker
- Re: IETF Logo Wear John C Klensin
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Jorge Amodio
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Lixia Zhang
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Ole Jacobsen
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Philip Nesser
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Jorge Amodio
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Ted Ts'o
- Re: IETF Logo Wear Dave CROCKER