Re: Telechat reviews [Re: Tooling glitch in Last Call announcements and records]

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 17 October 2024 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C729C14F6AB; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pKwVAFSZmUqO; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F3CCC1DA1FE; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD411800D; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 13:05:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id kGwhUXjOXEOe; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 13:05:40 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1729184740; bh=J95iOnZ9LxIWQX9cvGmvqKWX6y36Ryr73Z0AsF1wnFY=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=pvlimveRJwT3obKo4r0Pad+7zvq5W3ckNZOF7rgSZd6hK0Buk0OYmijEU5rTzEFoC Te1ovQxv4z/RUxLWZxuz6RAbyyOVfbaHS4wcVf18XnbFSJe8IxTjFK8Zj36C17W+GS QfWVcGonu++PCOOkMB2ecwG2MU4v5Rs1QXrbgqlqMc1DwppPnbyZxXCuBkJtYdQ3V2 G2fn1ucmc+XkBm1ZceAf7tVzjkUxpBkvOuTMbtIlmWhq8fuLt/78A0xdoS3kRAdIhK q12+8HYyZmOWS6YK960PuEWF+k89PmJr4E/RDB0SdGQIHPXUegPPOfmrWzoor/uVwB NSPoAtqn2DEGA==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E111800C; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 13:05:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E39897C; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 13:05:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Telechat reviews [Re: Tooling glitch in Last Call announcements and records]
In-Reply-To: <330ec427-adcb-44d0-80f4-00739b65a554@gmail.com>
References: <822159B0D390905C0A194997@PSB> <e8a0b44b-8ecf-4b24-94d4-9c79ddd26d41@amsl.com> <F3ACA29EAAC4DE9FE06EDA21@PSB> <CAL0qLwaKw8P7CGXXXHM5Hh6YvkMMqeN8OOgpv2v7Yrob5QsQ7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVDqmcyjmbTZz3CU3zUXXtrQwfXZUS=PBhgtGK+NChhPtw@mail.gmail.com> <LV8PR11MB8536614B239A214C0E9D6981B5462@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CALaySJK_ZZOgs+BjMMWA-vLO8n0ogy-WyDFCmOtGepjuohsGJQ@mail.gmail.com> <LV8PR11MB85361A9905FA2DF21577E56BB5462@LV8PR11MB8536.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <PH0PR11MB49661916B9FC62942BDB26E7A9462@PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <330ec427-adcb-44d0-80f4-00739b65a554@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 13:05:40 -0400
Message-ID: <14749.1729184740@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: 57FCJIOJZLXQ5SX2X7TXUXX63JWGQEB6
X-Message-ID-Hash: 57FCJIOJZLXQ5SX2X7TXUXX63JWGQEB6
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ytHbz_aT9myj0h8xLauRqjuZZJ4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
    > It's interesting that a current AD and a recently retired AD have such
    > different views on the best procedure, and that suggests to me that
    > there is no fully automated approach that will apply to all cases.

Both want it before Last Call, but at the earliest, when WGLC starts.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide