Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 12 November 2016 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B531294BA; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:34:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=opendkim.org header.b=fT7WVSEJ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elandsys.com header.b=YNGBaOYW
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WBIB2WPwkTRG; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FE4129490; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.227.80.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uACGYKr9010855 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:34:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1478968472; x=1479054872; bh=lpiwe8YzQVsvOa9eSt1Wb8b5F+Q6lF3N2V6MvEwJXeU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=fT7WVSEJs+Bsdv3hQYw/Q6gl+xTi1UpGOTX+PVshlSYVLHojZKq8xxcgYE0vlmP0N DjJZRCPAAthylNvK7VDUwmCg3X3A9keUvHMvKlIXtcGEKVfD3dwq+ttBmkkMfkKmWb BAZqeXgQwt4mTHS08S7qD8aXLAeABuUP2L5DIoxs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1478968472; x=1479054872; i=@elandsys.com; bh=lpiwe8YzQVsvOa9eSt1Wb8b5F+Q6lF3N2V6MvEwJXeU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=YNGBaOYWfxpBhRwUHYXTfL6jhosKh1b9vBMBrzwJwPmb1TyQwXatWvGCOfj0TopIJ zqJX5Kz5gCbVIBKL3isZQiJzxKBMr6svuqJDPUWpR8lF7KY8RcBmHhNPQpzpuRFSFi fYq7FK4FYCmfjommT9ymnAmfaNndC7gbYGqjrx1k=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20161112065759.0b031850@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:26:54 -0800
To: iaoc@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20160715083734.0bf97f78@elandnews.com>
References: <20160316170239.30920.41218.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160318005648.0e552fc8@resistor.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20160328021617.0e0a0e08@resistor.net> <081801d188e1$3ea75d70$bbf61850$@olddog.co.uk> <56F912B8.9070001@gondrom.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20160714083607.0ce35198@elandnews.com> <0AA26172-A842-4E6C-B7C4-DFFEA25DE22B@sobco.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160715083734.0bf97f78@elandnews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yyC27ljy0_afrWndM6vrgSAzcgY>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:34:34 -0000

Dear IAOC,

In March 2016, the IAOC solicited input [1] on a proposed IETF 
Privacy Policy.  According to the IETF Administrative Director the 
IETF is required by California law to have
an accurate privacy policy on its websites.  I sent some input in 
March and asked a few questions ( 
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg97207.html 
).  There has been a change of IAOC Chair since that time.  I 
received responses when I sent reminders about the 
questions.  However, the questions remain unanswered to this day.

Would it be possible to get a timely answer to the questions which I 
asked in March?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg97181.html