Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review

S Moonesamy <> Sat, 12 November 2016 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B531294BA; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:34:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.497
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.b=fT7WVSEJ; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.b=YNGBaOYW
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WBIB2WPwkTRG; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FE4129490; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uACGYKr9010855 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:34:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1478968472; x=1479054872; bh=lpiwe8YzQVsvOa9eSt1Wb8b5F+Q6lF3N2V6MvEwJXeU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=fT7WVSEJs+Bsdv3hQYw/Q6gl+xTi1UpGOTX+PVshlSYVLHojZKq8xxcgYE0vlmP0N DjJZRCPAAthylNvK7VDUwmCg3X3A9keUvHMvKlIXtcGEKVfD3dwq+ttBmkkMfkKmWb BAZqeXgQwt4mTHS08S7qD8aXLAeABuUP2L5DIoxs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1478968472; x=1479054872;; bh=lpiwe8YzQVsvOa9eSt1Wb8b5F+Q6lF3N2V6MvEwJXeU=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=YNGBaOYWfxpBhRwUHYXTfL6jhosKh1b9vBMBrzwJwPmb1TyQwXatWvGCOfj0TopIJ zqJX5Kz5gCbVIBKL3isZQiJzxKBMr6svuqJDPUWpR8lF7KY8RcBmHhNPQpzpuRFSFi fYq7FK4FYCmfjommT9ymnAmfaNndC7gbYGqjrx1k=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 08:26:54 -0800
From: S Moonesamy <>
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <081801d188e1$3ea75d70$bbf61850$> <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 16:34:34 -0000

Dear IAOC,

In March 2016, the IAOC solicited input [1] on a proposed IETF 
Privacy Policy.  According to the IETF Administrative Director the 
IETF is required by California law to have
an accurate privacy policy on its websites.  I sent some input in 
March and asked a few questions ( 
).  There has been a change of IAOC Chair since that time.  I 
received responses when I sent reminders about the 
questions.  However, the questions remain unanswered to this day.

Would it be possible to get a timely answer to the questions which I 
asked in March?

S. Moonesamy