Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 31 January 2017 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D174129412 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:15:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AYNPLHkDdsIt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:15:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E171204D9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 01:15:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481482D299; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:15:48 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jR-aS6lYcW4i; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:15:47 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE96A2CC9B; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:15:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Subject: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_84FC1E49-8573-4E6F-885C-1FBC37AC9853"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAEjQQ5XrbyxryZK8veNcY7+Y9qFXJyq4dc208gctOgxS3j2aDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:16:03 +0200
Message-Id: <5909F002-7E53-4769-8768-A4A1402F29DC@piuha.net>
References: <CAAUuzMQwk5v+3HA+KFrsCZfbNSXFpgBE0XdKfJWHgDss9-VkTw@mail.gmail.com> <20170130183846.21994.qmail@server322.com> <AB7E9EDD-C313-4821-8BEC-D0AF57D80DA2@nohats.ca> <2D08A4C9-969C-4EFD-8782-84728C458EA3@piuha.net> <CAEjQQ5XrbyxryZK8veNcY7+Y9qFXJyq4dc208gctOgxS3j2aDw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Naeem Khademi <naeem.khademi@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yyZNwU4epwCFjn8jp5I_sYbjm_Y>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:15:51 -0000

> Just a clarification: some affected folks may not appear on such data as is, since the IETF registration form asks for "country of residence" and has only one field as "country of citizenship"; most people with dual citizenship would have entered the country of citizenship that they thought would have made it easier to get visa based on (since it's noted in the IETF invitation letter for visa application) or even be exempted from visa. The second nationality would have only appeared on the visa application form used at the embassy and not in the IETF data.

Yes, that’s right.

Jari