Re: Meeting "lounges" at IETF meetings

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 03 August 2012 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411D011E80A6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r6tdt2ROW5Rn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E3B11E80D9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18774171475; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:37:37 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1344033456; bh=BINAtUb4O1icc/ A9EbjFqD+2zdXVnyDNGOgt0W4wOM4=; b=KenHqMlEATPG2bo2IZ2qm5WmPawW/A 2Qat60jqconl31smbr+f5fi7xiz9bR8kMqBqWVuuuT+hLm3V7ryuEeVJaH5igzqr d/yiwZc7FQ9Q+vdWH5C2U7m1LSkpfMcYhNXt0A2iCHi2z6l0Ufksm6ATxwWGHKtQ TyeAvfVt86euwq+SmY19OnYI19kFbtupjkRlIyZ4AI2Hv6ftO4ClTchHnAqxs3oA R7QWa7apprJE/DlwZAsmB2gHTmlzkzIJAEORoV1LHlar3r002IHfda+pbM9xVJIW MCQQqTjUvlvSivowbbF0j8+ycWkqbJMSegFGfb+8/Bz7gnmYk6t5LZcw==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id nmj3ayyr4RVj; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:37:36 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8:0:64:8853:ef9b:1b62:6a9b] (unknown [IPv6:2001:df8:0:64:8853:ef9b:1b62:6a9b]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F73C171472; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 23:37:34 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <501C52AC.1010106@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 23:37:32 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Meeting "lounges" at IETF meetings
References: <D7F9B7BE-0ED6-4B8C-808C-C75FA1A6800B@vpnc.org> <CAHBDyN6VaL3fgYe+C+o9d93VZ1bR_EDmrPN7-Sv+7BiJ9+Q9AA@mail.gmail.com> <m2ipczu5mu.wl%randy@psg.com> <42D7895B-8949-41FF-AE5B-0C9B813CEE8C@mnot.net> <m2d337u3fc.wl%randy@psg.com> <20104150-FCF4-4914-8656-72FFC9BA94AA@lucidvision.com> <CAHBDyN63_r2TEf7h81r9NYnQbdriC9Ztr-cT7vapO0uyRYB5_w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1208031505550.16675@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1208031505550.16675@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:37:39 -0000

On 08/03/2012 11:10 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> 
> The narrowness of the corridoors, placement of food/drink and all that 
> was discussed in our wrap-up meeting this morning, and indeed the 
> issues you have raised were indentified as areas for improvement. 
> Since we are coming back to THIS hotel, there are certainly things 
> that can be done better, and will be done better, next time. 

That gives the NOC folks time to figure out how to take
over the elevator system for next time too:-)

S

> 
> Ole
> 
> 
> Ole J. Jacobsen
> Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
> Cisco Systems
> Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
> E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
> Skype: organdemo
> 
> 
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, Mary Barnes wrote:
> 
>> The issue that I experienced (and why I'm fussing)  is that if you were
>> attending many sessions in the Regency rooms (and moving rooms between
>> sessions), it was extremely difficult to weave your way through the
>> corridor as many people were having their discussion directly in the middle
>> of the corridor.  There just was not room in that corridor for side
>> conversations.  The situation was made worse as that corridor was where
>> they served the refreshments.   And trying to ask people politely to move
>> generally had no impact in my experience as people were too engaged in
>> their conversations.
>>
>> Mary.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I agree with randy. I've never had an issue finding a place to huddle/meet
>>> when necessary at an ietf meeting venue. between the hallways, bar, etc I'm
>>> not sure what the fuss is all about.
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 3, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> i have no need to micro-manage the secretariat.
>>>>> seems to happen a lot around here...
>>>>
>>>> symptom of too much free time on hands
>>>>
>>>> randy
>>>>
>>>
>>