Re: Consultation on *revised* IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Thu, 04 June 2020 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BDF3A0FF4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BzMKTfnBkVy5; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macbook-pro.localdomain (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F380B3A0FCD; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: Consultation on *revised* IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <8e532d51-9d3f-193b-f7eb-2560099ed58b@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 09:51:28 +1200
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <68DDE974-B4B5-46D4-8BAB-4F4C4A2EEC3C@ietf.org>
References: <159115348321.13976.12703268950916172390@ietfa.amsl.com> <5435ade6-fdaa-4793-e5cd-438f6a0298d4@cs.tcd.ie> <1FE0EF67-6AC8-424B-8E30-5B85C931B230@ietf.org> <d3626a2f-271a-b85b-35da-32cb9213212a@cs.tcd.ie> <D1E59F95-BB36-4D86-A937-327AE04E8F5F@ietf.org> <8e532d51-9d3f-193b-f7eb-2560099ed58b@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/yzup-HJWailvwbX7Xn3vu4zFgy0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 21:51:43 -0000


> On 4/06/2020, at 10:13 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> If you read my mail, the comment was that all this
> "journey" stuff was either waffly or over-reach and
> that ditching the fashionista term and using clear
> English would be needed to determine which. I think
> that's a clear comment.

Your responses so far suggest that you have no regard for the field of UX for which user journey mapping is a foundational technique, and as I’m not willing to abandon the use of those techniques to help us in our work I’m not sure how far we can go with this.  However I’ve had one last attempt by creating a new issue 

	https://github.com/ietf-llc/strategy-2020-consultation/issues/43 "More clarity around participant journey" 

and addressing that with this change

	https://github.com/ietf-llc/strategy-2020-consultation/commit/ddc0af3e2d5628a71ca6eaca8359c6187ac40b01#diff-ace2c9f1dd155e5220c2a50de0c79018

Jay

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@ietf.org