Re: eating our own dogfood...Re: IPv4 Outage

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Wed, 19 December 2007 09:28 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4vE9-0003Dl-D4; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:28:33 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4vE7-0003Df-Sz for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:28:31 -0500
Received: from sequoia.muada.com ([83.149.65.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4vE2-0007Sp-09 for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:28:31 -0500
Received: from [IPv6:2001:720:410:1001:21b:63ff:fe92:9fbb] ([IPv6:2001:720:410:1001:21b:63ff:fe92:9fbb]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lBJ9R3Kh036505 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:27:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <95722E61-053A-4876-A6CC-35DD497841C1@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <20071219052738.GA27468@boreas.isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:27:04 +0100
References: <20071219020600.GF7070@thunk.org> <200712190320.lBJ3KWT4099846@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20071219050536.GH7070@thunk.org> <20071219052738.GA27468@boreas.isi.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=3.5 tests=BAYES_00, ILJQX_SUBJ_NUMINWORD autolearn=no version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on sequoia.muada.com
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Cc: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: eating our own dogfood...Re: IPv4 Outage
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 19 dec 2007, at 6:27, Bill Manning wrote:

> 	I point to the the RSSAC(*) meeting minutes from Chicago
> 	and Vancouver for the ICANN statements as to why the AAAA
> 	records for the root servers have not been added to date.

http://www.rssac.org/meetings/04-08/RSSAC28.pdf :

4 - AAAA support - David
  The report was received and the technical issues are not an issue -  
this is a policy issue and no one from the
2
policy group is here. The question is raised, what else does the IANA  
need and when can it ask? The IANA GM does
3
not have the right questions to ask internally. Who are we/IANA  
waiting on?  We are waiting on the executive staff at
4
ICANN.  Not clear if there are other hurdles to jump after that is done.
5


http://www.rssac.org/meetings/04-08/rssac29.pdf :

IPv6 status: (Bill Manning)

2
Not much has changed since our last meeting.  At least four of the  
root server operators have demonstrated IPv6
3
capability and have formally requested that ICANN add them to the  
root.  This is based on the RSSAC/SSAC joint
4
recommendation that said that this is OK to do. At the last meeting,  
the IANA general manager said that it's in
5
ICANN's executive/policy committee.  We'd really like some feedback  
from either IANA or ICANN about when the
6
requests will be processed. A formal request will be sent from RSSAC  
to ICANN asking for the requests to be
7
processed. This will not be a public announcement.
8


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf