Re: 10 a.m.

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 11 July 2016 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1ED12B03B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SJSDPsSRcZZK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F370912B02A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mfilter11-d.gandi.net (mfilter11-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.131]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65CE6A80C4; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:25:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter11-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.195]) by mfilter11-d.gandi.net (mfilter11-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qjgGMgYwHiR5; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:25:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 93.199.242.26
Received: from nar-3.local (p5DC7F21A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.242.26]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60340A80BF; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:25:40 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <57841CE1.60709@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:25:37 +0200
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 10 a.m.
References: <ffde10f3-3084-3267-04bd-e052d120bc01@gmail.com> <41f9104e-335f-b2a9-3ca8-9d5b0e7de3b6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <41f9104e-335f-b2a9-3ca8-9d5b0e7de3b6@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/z5fX3FEElifldW5-eEyhQad2GMg>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:25:45 -0000

Stewart Bryant wrote:
> I am more concerned that we have wasted five hours of meeting time

Actually, we have won five hours of productive time that can be used by
small groups to get work done together before going into the WG meetings.

(And, by the way, 11:30 is not lunchtime in most parts of Germany, so
the Argentina timeshift makes sense in Germany as well.)

Grüße, Carsten