Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 02 October 2013 14:55 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DAB21F9196 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 07:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hPvV+VKRG079 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 07:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7007921F8411 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 07:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 77229 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2013 14:53:00 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 2 Oct 2013 14:53:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=524c334c.xn--btvx9d.k1309; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=sv/Ywx6Svc+xuNW4nAgmBlNe+qe8UiKejQq9TMtaH8A=; b=GVPLQVmu5nNeQ8wlMG6Kds/DM0O8QMJz/4X3xIo5CA0+qlY0RQQVQLfFYaFQtQgG9ZbIW0vCZHclsi27OSRdusg3tn7vxOnkiHnreYP2bVQzluz17Gsg5pWtBJSFEKSmsAL1nnR3kW/ZE5BsYyyPqDjH9XW3lRJpHCWN5WZKnuWBkWYL8M1mVGSQrlTJUhGMB9E84rjlbBdPqFWjxkTIQWhdOJyfyGaFIbleEx0OkAk6ldFVU+kAVhdwOuu8CQ15
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=524c334c.xn--btvx9d.k1309; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=sv/Ywx6Svc+xuNW4nAgmBlNe+qe8UiKejQq9TMtaH8A=; b=UnIq/uQ6WBNkiKGjcLrQl4AxAzySqjjRd8faVgeITH/VcMsOMkknFPM9GwN+JRV65SHKUDl6+Prt/S+BBDoSyeEEFkEcbqahaAuNDmgoaBA/fCqr+vXKgMzB168KtwyVtRnabyxYxmpMxf4ZF2wtAJ5nPXxWB1g9P4zLWLNWb9gABYiTc+3u0tHWtsQDxx0EvFaf3QHRfaGbSriiitktBOdH1lUuXXpx76sFB6aRPXjQJWp0JbC/IbvJZcvMLPgm
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:52:38 -0000
Message-ID: <20131002145238.78084.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
In-Reply-To: <20131002144143.20697.85830.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:55:06 -0000
>The IESG has received a request from an individual participant to make >the following status changes: > >- RFC5617 from Proposed Standard to Historic > >The supporting document for this request can be found here: > >http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-adsp-rfc5617-to-historic/ I'm one of the authors of this RFC and support the change. ADSP was basically an experiment that failed. It has no significant deployment, and the problem it was supposed to solve is now being addressed in other ways. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John Levine
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- RE: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… ietfdbh
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Hector Santos
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Scott Kitterman
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Hector Santos
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Hector Santos
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Douglas Otis
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Murray S. Kucherawy
- How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP to Hi… Hector Santos
- Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP t… Barry Leiba
- Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP t… Hector Santos
- Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP t… Douglas Otis
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP t… Hector Santos
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Bob Braden
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Hector Santos
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Bradner, Scott
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Bradner, Scott
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Procedural Changes through side-effect (was: Re: … John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Procedural Changes through side-effect (was: … S Moonesamy
- Spontaneous Procedure Invention ( was Re: Procedu… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… S Moonesamy