Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work

[Dan Harkins <[e-mail]>]

   There are obviously some things that we must not ridicule.


   regards,


   Dan.

On 4/1/21 1:37 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
> On 4/1/21 3:40 PM, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>
>> I am trying to make up my mind on this, so could you please clarify 
>> the following: what did you judge to be in violation of the code of 
>> conduct, the substance, the tone or the method (or all of them)?
>>
>> In other words: is holding or expressing the opinion that "ongoing 
>> efforts to make the IETF more accessible to all interested 
>> participants are somehow overblown, not useful, or Orwellian in 
>> nature" a violation of the code of conduct?
>>
>> Or is it the fact that this opinion was expressed through a (mildly) 
>> satyrical text, rather than straightforwardly?
>>
>> Or is it the fact that the text was posted through the Internet draft 
>> process?
>>
>> Thank you in advance for the clarification.
>
> I would also like this to be clarified.
>
> Keith
>
>