IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ISOC and PIR board analogies (Was Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy)

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Thu, 16 January 2020 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E031200DF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:23:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wUVQoFTvFooh; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from macbook-pro.localdomain (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49DD51200DE; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:23:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <3A3B8F8C-548C-40F2-9100-135B87E4B2A1@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9D8BBE7F-7878-4C21-B5A3-637C5ED83793"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
Subject: Re: ISOC and PIR board analogies (Was Re: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy)
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:23:19 +1300
In-Reply-To: <m2h80vngl7.wl-randy@psg.com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <sullivan@isoc.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
References: <89f2653c-4333-665b-51b3-c4a860a78288@comcast.net> <3AFAE1F0-B7DA-4D00-8FB5-39D9ECE41596@puck.nether.net> <m2muannkp1.wl-randy@psg.com> <20200116223454.yqfjrahykxcnbcfg@mx4.yitter.info> <m2h80vngl7.wl-randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zCNpHXvvj_LwzdyFkG1XpewrVSM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 23:23:23 -0000

Randy

> On 17/01/2020, at 12:09 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
> andrew and jay
> 
> if i was looking at this from 10,000m, which i partially am, jay being
> anywhere near the pir decision making is a clear conflict of inbterest.
> that y'all don't see this says a lot about how the ietf/isoc culture
> sees conflict of interest; which was my point, not to pick on jay.

If you would be good enough to explain what you see as the conflict of interest (i.e. what opportunity is there for me to act improperly in this situation?) then I and possibly others can take steps to mitigate against that.

kind regards
Jay

> 
> i believe my friend who was asking will be in touch directly.  but we
> suspect you will still be shoveling kitty litter over it qs fast as
> possible.
> 
> qed
> 
> randy
> 

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@ietf.org
+64 21 678840

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email