Re: [IAB] Draft Fees for Processing Legal Requests Policy

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Thu, 02 August 2012 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B7E11E8197; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.152, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m+9F8uuVAtZt; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862CF11E80F5; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,702,1336374000"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="672285146"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 02 Aug 2012 11:07:07 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.76.240]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q72I77ZQ001168; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.13]) by vmwexceht02-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.240]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:07:06 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: IETF Administrative Director <iad@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IAB] Draft Fees for Processing Legal Requests Policy
Thread-Topic: [IAB] Draft Fees for Processing Legal Requests Policy
Thread-Index: AQHNcM6F4lt8DZmzr0CanT4RQaDhJ5dHRvkA
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:07:06 +0000
Message-ID: <23C09D95-E873-40C1-9BF5-3378290C9FD0@netapp.com>
References: <20120802164717.20616.13622.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120802164717.20616.13622.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.115]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_019FCBF4-0AEB-43B1-91EE-DADB522F7EF3"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<wgchairs@ietf.org>" <wgchairs@ietf.org>, "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>, "<iaoc@ietf.org>" <iaoc@ietf.org>, "<iab@iab.org>" <iab@iab.org>, "<iesg@ietf.org>" <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:07:08 -0000

Looks good to me, but I agree with whoever suggested to increase the fees. I think you could easily double or triple them.

On Aug 2, 2012, at 9:47, IETF Administrative Director <iad@ietf.org> wrote:

> A reminder of the deadline of 6 August for input.
> Thanks
> 
> The IAOC is seeking community feedback on a proposed policy by the IAOC to impose 
> fees to produce information and authenticate documents in response to subpoenas and 
> other legal requests.
> 
> The IETF receives requests for information, documentation, authentication or other 
> matters through subpoenas and less formal means that require manpower and materials 
> to be expended.  These requests are on the rise. During the period 2005 to 2010 the IETF 
> responded to nine subpoenas.  Since 2011 the IETF has received five subpoenas and three 
> other legal requests for authenticated documents.  
> 
> Each such request is time sensitive and involves the IETF Counsel, the IAD, and members 
> of the IAOC, who together form the Legal Management Committee, to rapidly analyze and 
> identify the means for satisfying the request.  Often there is a need to retain outside counsel, 
> especially in cases that might lead to depositions or court testimony. 
> 
> The IAOC believes a Schedule of Fees is an appropriate and reasonable means to recover 
> costs associated with such efforts.
> 
> The draft policy entitled Draft Fee Policy for Legal Requests can be found 
> at: <http://iaoc.ietf.org/policyandprocedures.html>
> 
> Before adopting a policy the IAOC would like feedback on this before making a 
> decision.  Comments appreciated to ietf@ietf.org by 6 August 2012.
> 
> Ray Pelletier
> IETF Administrative Director