IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting

Dmitry Burkov <dburk@burkov.aha.ru> Fri, 03 August 2012 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <dburk@burkov.aha.ru>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEB621F8E37 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 08:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.902
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.460, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_RU=0.595, HELO_IS_SMALL6=0.556, HOST_EQ_RU=0.875, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tMYOVTdcuuzV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 08:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aha.ru (backend13.aha.ru [62.113.86.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0834821F8E30 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 08:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [83.149.9.12] (account dburk@burkov.aha.ru HELO [10.106.132.133]) by backend13.aha.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.11) with ESMTPSA id 310670393; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 19:54:14 +0400
References: <CAMm+LwhKUZK9RGSmrntB6ZZVfnXRsaZfUcpWvVhWnxWRgdBjbw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120802115334.04b486b8@resistor.net> <7557FA6E-827D-431F-B434-ACA619E1ACB2@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <7557FA6E-827D-431F-B434-ACA619E1ACB2@virtualized.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <C9A6D67B-C4EE-4411-A4A8-69C27D66C577@burkov.aha.ru>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206)
From: Dmitry Burkov <dburk@burkov.aha.ru>
Subject: Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 19:52:03 +0400
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Cc: SM <sm@resistor.net>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 15:54:18 -0000

I hope too as they still ignore the procedures

Sent from my iPhone

On 03.08.2012, at 19:37, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:

> On Aug 2, 2012, at 12:55 PM, SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote:
>> If the ITU-T wants a /16 it is simply a matter of asking the IETF for it.
> 
> And, unless the reason the ITU-T was requesting the /16 was for some protocol that came up with that has global applicability that needed a /16 of IPv6 space, they'd be redirected to an RIR.
> 
> Regards,
> -drc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email