Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors

Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Tue, 17 September 2013 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <hsantos@isdg.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB1411E858E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.253
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.253 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.518, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aO-klnfxbgwG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ntbbs.winserver.com (mail.catinthebox.net [208.247.131.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092B211E858C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=isdg.net; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/relaxed; l=906; t=1379452122; h=Received:Received: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject: List-ID; bh=E+BqwVpDJoOU0WFzQL6MH9wx2CM=; b=C53mlXJZqPdjLvn/8JKa wcoX9Aen0o3fxGeAn30ELNwPhtssxpn86ukbUsJwb5wW2PPb8m2dMCI2BYUDFuMp CQM08IMf/vJhjhofiBGQZjDTs3TIKBkZiFc8c/+hTvEPjnjg+pPuSiePdZbrVmS1 UoFTw81VIa2UkTkVqV63TwY=
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v7.0.454.4) for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:08:42 -0400
Authentication-Results: dkim.winserver.com; dkim=pass header.d=beta.winserver.com header.s=tms1 header.i=beta.winserver.com; adsp=pass policy=all author.d=isdg.net asl.d=beta.winserver.com;
Received: from opensite.winserver.com ([208.247.131.23]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v7.0.454.4) with ESMTP id 1619643021.6080.4420; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:08:40 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=beta.winserver.com; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/relaxed; l=906; t=1379451761; h=Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:To:Subject:List-ID; bh=ZOQ7o8e nv4yrYrY+2NK2NedBLRHTzjg29CjmZLmzfIw=; b=KMBtO5SJydNhIRsJUkNEVsM w+TbTF6JaYebPVUGztY8LT1shHoMKuqW2pzNNcswpYkpN972aqzffYdFThRxeGhT winJu/VvAcyrrNoRLBHAHqhO4GQSuKheyoWGoYsLOX6D7YBYCsdulYf1gLvW95qZ ASt65uytV4/wdGtDYhic=
Received: by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v7.0.454.4) for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:02:41 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([99.121.4.27]) by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v7.0.454.4) with ESMTP id 1066042144.9.7156; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:02:40 -0400
Message-ID: <5238C4D2.9060604@isdg.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:08:34 -0400
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
Subject: Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for contributors
References: <20130916203141.86927.qmail@joyce.lan> <C65F64A8-2D7B-47AF-BAAC-DE4DE57586B7@checkpoint.com> <523791FB.2070807@gmail.com> <CABiXOEm+D4oE7NePHmR5gviOJURqkSAhDhGb=s1o1ayJZAc7kQ@mail.gmail.com> <523845F5.9050902@gmail.com> <CABiXOEmhe5p8jMW2W=9qnhUZ_ORhwKCgA1_-dxK_NtGNy7g1zA@mail.gmail.com> <5238517F.8060705@joelhalpern.com> <6014.1379431237@sandelman.ca> <A3B67B91B80804CC611555AD@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <A6729341-EF60-40A3-830E-2138A6A60AEE@shinkuro.com> <7406B04A-903D-4765-9FC1-4880F68DD9FF@lurchi.franken.de> <CAPv4CP-2h_=GnO7JQPPhFc=TFn5kinmWaurZUn4B0G69vhWE7g@mail.gmail.com> <E664BD6A-EADF-4FAF-A2A6-F0429595989C@lurchi.franken.de> <5238B12C.9020103@isdg.net> <230E3867-634B-4364-BFA3-CAAB89BF7A83@checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <230E3867-634B-4364-BFA3-CAAB89BF7A83@checkpoint.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 21:08:50 -0000

On 9/17/2013 4:52 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>
> Having an IETF identity is OK if all you ever publish is in the IETF. Some of our participants also publish at other SDOs such as IEEE, W3C, ITU, and quite a few publish Academic papers. Using the same identifier for all these places would be useful, and that single identifier is not going to be an @ietf.org email address.
>

Then for these unique individuals, a single source id is useful for 
them and should be recommended to consolidate contact consistent and 
persistent information.  People are increasingly doing that now with 
what was once alias junk domains, i.e. gmail.com, google+, even 
facebook, twitter, etc. I know I have move away from a using a 
corporate id in public that are now protected (in spirit) by ADSP and 
DKIM.  But as a total, don't you think the ietf.org will benefit in 
the long run maintaining its own registry?

-- 
HLS