Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12
Roni Even <roni.even@mail01.huawei.com> Thu, 15 December 2016 13:05 UTC
Return-Path: <roni.even@mail01.huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69C5129DA8; Thu, 15 Dec 2016 05:05:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roni Even <roni.even@mail01.huawei.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.39.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148180713687.27658.2938123182879685300.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 05:05:36 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zSuRn51e5xdisOHFZt3s1g7hRe8>
Cc: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 13:05:37 -0000
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2016-12-15 IETF LC End Date: 2016–12-22 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a BCP RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: I think the document need an editorial review, a lot of text in passive language, for example third paragraph in section 1 "BGPsec needs to be spoken only by an AS's eBGP speaking, AKA border, routers, and is designed so that it can be used to protect announcements which are originated by resource constrained edge routers." is written in passive language and it is also a long sentence.
- Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12 Roni Even
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12 Jari Arkko
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12 Randy Bush
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12 Randy Bush