Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 25 February 2009 01:11 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767393A69EC for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:11:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.78
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.78 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VQ0Gnj5Uy6p9 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:11:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (ag-out-0708.google.com [72.14.246.245]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A36D3A67EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:11:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 5so2386080agb.12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:12:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=u2gCSG+KJMqsId5KM9sYx7vwfbnzsWb6n4EKpHClL0U=; b=io2WvOs+zEdf6CdpJlLQxBT2HaKJIg/hgEPxaB6EcoV/QTYq1HNE5eNxtbNSpA168s 5DLRV0V7gYAAJlduVWlteU7x5dPNemcTPnsTHU2Zmzf/yluWwOXV4y1g5hF1SsAfmT88 mXkZ5CeMZf1RGFVt6Oilm+OZqWrREQ7P8wdgE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=B6KvzbCKGZ7y4iDm7IL0+YijLUxfAwjOoCj7iVezPNHXoC6EXrFUdrkOrvw/oy+FkH P+AEwEQSAre4RzFp3iYFKZfOaGTZDYTA4YMjWxzfB2vaXE3547H126dO9kiKaEQOpHhV 4kg/rt0BpQvEIuHiYd/7xtTPJw98tg956BmNo=
Received: by 10.110.33.15 with SMTP id g15mr8524578tig.58.1235524327485; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:12:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?172.31.8.165? ([222.128.247.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w5sm2461826tib.5.2009.02.24.17.12.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:12:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49A49AE6.3040009@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:12:06 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate
References: <20090213001531.2CFE46BE551@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <4994D366.5010206@gmail.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.0902121802050.25480@egate.xpasc.com> <4994DC20.2070107@es2eng.com> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A0301B8C882@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902131009460.25480@egate.xpasc.com> <1F37C3B8-ABF4-4193-B65F-DF4FD21D58E8@cisco.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902241704430.17049@egate.xpasc.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902241704430.17049@egate.xpasc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:11:51 -0000

On 2009-02-25 14:05, David Morris wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> 
>>
>> On Feb 13, 2009, at 11:15 AM, David Morris wrote:
>>
>>> while providing the operational efficiency of collecting all
>>> discussion in one place for actual analysis of last call
>>
>> While there may be better ways of doing it, I'll note the IETF LC
>> subject line is constructed to make it possible to find the LC
>> comments. If you remove the draft name from subject line of any LC
>> replies, you substantially reduce the odds of them being found and
>> read by the IESG.
> 
> But by forcing that assumption, you preclude the possiblity of
> sub-dividing the discussion into related topics.


No. Just retain the draft name as part of the subject header.
To discuss foobars:

Subject: Foobars [Re: draft-ietf-barfoo-stuff-73.txt]

   Brian

    Brian