Re: IAB Response to Appeal from [...]

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Wed, 01 February 2006 03:36 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F48ms-0005qF-NH; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:36:06 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F48mm-0005iQ-3S for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:36:02 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA02122 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:34:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F48xm-00030x-9y for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:47:22 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1F48mP-0003Cg-Be for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:35:37 +0100
Received: from 1cust232.tnt6.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net ([149.225.18.232]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:35:37 +0100
Received: from nobody by 1cust232.tnt6.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:35:37 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:33:17 +0100
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <43E02BFD.778E@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <43DFAC4B.1070309@thinkingcat.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20060201011759.06605eb0@mail.jefsey.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 1cust232.tnt6.hbg2.deu.da.uu.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: IAB Response to Appeal from [...]
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:

> I hope this list will soon be a IANA managed mailing list,
> or that the IESG requires the WG-ltru to gives it a more
> precise status through RFC 3066 bis (a debate I proposed
> and I was denied).

That's of course not the case, it was debated for quite some
time in "the making of 30066bis":

<http://mid.gmane.org/42B0A3A6.7694@xyzzy.claranet.de>
<http://mid.gmane.org/42B32C25.1466@xyzzy.claranet.de>

Just two examples grepping for "3934" in an LTRU archive.
 
> I consider that Harald and I are both only trying to do our
> best to clarify a complex issue to the benefit of the users
> and of the IETF. I genuinely hope the IAB decision will help
> us to openly discuss it, taking the necessary time.

Whatever it takes.  I like a new IAB draft published recently:
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-iab-idn-nextsteps-02>
-- 
Frank



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf