Re: Realistic responses to DMARC

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Sun, 18 December 2016 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76C11293F9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:13:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yQE7gDoWn--j for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A12E120725 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id y198so128238987oia.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:13:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GK93vggfkCgtt6WWn4/jeWbpldQUYGJ7M9l3vF94P+8=; b=bOS/+yNOLW17F+W38eNQTCXkBMq35pqDgh91Q9+cDUdpo8IBUpOCfaA4bW96XqI/ya sSDpWieT6cxn4Okg8McxfVTwxU5zCYD33SZtcT+vfoR9GdCCVq9pFLR1ldSH1Ao3Pf+J TU0jHbrLMxCa1VGB3EngFZTOOMYY+UVZj+pKFOmnCXbM+qwSA/fiYJz1tAzs11Df/zyR hE65N7HZlDajJ8s39ycmvDzDpdcI3iTgLaLFx8QNN7f7vkTzY+GRlWAkbKqsfwgYm/o3 FAU+R5QQBC1MueQeHhw6NGPtqI40w9IfT7hmHBVMhFPsUzQ4alOswDFT+2+gXtY/Aq+e StwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GK93vggfkCgtt6WWn4/jeWbpldQUYGJ7M9l3vF94P+8=; b=Q95nycs5nX7auajSUNLeYp72vwEgUcrAAlo0FOhRzUIqOlZzTVEjoLFuebH4J2mwJh F2n8+JT3BKPrj2J+RMg3U+4k7ekN8r+1eWNacM1l+lrcJ33ke9mDzoJJC2nLM9+0OA6u ya2grskjWR2/nNw4w2e5O/hpGNhaPPI8q78fODqiD6b8MJd9weiWq4+cf1DKAOfem7L3 TZA7sdmRa3T7IPPb71Ut6oz7v76DBq1MyIz9alFBaTdWbppoxKtwlL/JHXaZbdJ6I4kU y3ZtEyd0tvZuGUXz0i4A+PanAVy1qIcPaKl76XFxwFfH4UpVbiuwyrzwHisLFFXPHaCE jbHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03ESQYbqjCBXHIkMVMAPUNuVH70NlkvvkNHrWZuaJDtK7dlGf+/zzlk3Iqg8QO/kZAqKZj1XiQFQeougA==
X-Received: by 10.157.17.174 with SMTP id v43mr7013523otf.251.1482095614603; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:13:34 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.31.111 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:13:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180215450.14970@ary.qy>
References: <9AD6AAD6812D3B9F8379226B@PSB> <20161218022823.8779.qmail@ary.lan> <20161218055834.he6gkupqp5xqlvml@thunk.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180101460.14297@ary.qy> <20161218065905.5g66jgkvtckydmry@thunk.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1612180215450.14970@ary.qy>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 16:13:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2xJa+UX8JtjbKhpeYgjhN61sdUP=3wmTSzHrA-3vTZcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Realistic responses to DMARC
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c18fcd4a1b4290543f546f1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zbtxqfeNrxT06t4G53h1-KBr1J8>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 21:13:37 -0000

I’ve found that gmail puts DMARC fails (mostly from Yahoo and Google) into
the spam box, but doesn’t delete it. I check the spam box daily for false
positives, usually caused by DMARC.

Cheers,
Andy


On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 2:24 AM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> Therefore, a developer-friendly mail service MUST NOT have a p=reject
>> or p=quarantee DMARC policy, and MUST also ignore DMARC policies on
>> the receiving end.  Fortunately, these mail services do exist, even if
>> they aren't the big, free consumer ones.
>>
>
> Linux may be enough of a cult that developers will put up with having to
> use a mail account different from the one they use for everything else, but
> as I've said a couple of times already, I don't think the IETF can stand
> the blood loss.
>
> There are some workarounds, maybe ARC, maybe message wrapping, maybe some
> kind of From: munging.  We're looking at them and scratching our heads.
>
> R's,
> John
>
>